albury runs away from the truth again.

truth. alburys mortal enemy

as evidenced by his inordinate amount of official spin regurgitation, ( a quick google for albury smith 911 will show a history of his commenting on every blog concerning 911, posting the same lies, distortions and obfuscations ad nauseam, 24/7 ) this shows that he is either paid to do this or has severe mental disabilities, as pointed out by most everyone who has the misfortune to have ever crossed paths with the unflushable turd, and is as obvious as is the explosive destruction of the 3 towers that day.

the only people who would argue against a transparent, unfettered independent investigation into the events of 911 are those with a vested interest in supressing the truth.

there is irefutable evidence that the events of 911 did not happen as we are being told,

but despite that, and despite not being asked, albury will continue to offer his unqualified, anonymous opinion, as if he is some sort of final arbiter of truth, in relation to ANYTHING to do with 911. a self proclaimed expert..

its so pathetic, if it wasnt for the fact that on the backs of the lies of that fateful day, hundreds of thousands of innocent men women and children have been killed, civil and constitutional rights have been shredded, and the world has been subjected to a never ending war of terror, it would be funny.

This video puts to rest ALL of alburys arguments and shows exactly why 911 needs a proper investigation.
Professor Daniele Ganser (Switzerland) – 10 Years After 9/11 The Official Account Does Not Add Up

All in all I remain unconvinced from this article.
ww

I’m arguing for something quite different: the consilient testimony of multiple independent witnesses recorded shortly after the lived events is a kind of empirical evidence, and following Dr. Wood’s maxim and example in her book, we fit our theory to the evidence; we don’t discard evidence that doesn’t fit our favored theory.

Much of the clearest testimony of credible witnesses of explosions concerned the effects of explosions starting in the lower basement levels just before WTC 1 got its plane-shaped hole. Multiple large isolated explosions with devastating blast effects were reported by witnesses as having occurred at intervals throughout the period before the short 7-10 second destruction sequences.

We are not obliged to hold any particular hypothesis as to why perps would bother with conventional explosives that may have been detonated at a leisurely pace long before the dustification sequence. Nor are we justified to arbitrarily declare that perps would never violated the KISS rule.

We can infer that the perps decided to use the dustification gizmo in a Hiroshima-style threat display that would be unmistakable by potential global rivals: we have mastered the fearsome power of torsion physics–we can crush any group that challenges our bid for world domination.

At the same time the perps took great pains to make the attacks appear as a new Pearl Harbor to the public at large: a dastardly sneak attack executed using perfectly conventional physical principles. They have been at great pains to hide and suppress evidence of torsion physics for almost 150 years, because popular knowledge of the full range of technology made possible by applying the true physics would threaten the perps’ monopoly of political and economic power.

We are neither obliged nor allowed to discount all witness testimony of preliminary explosions consistent with powerful demolition-style explosives.

Of course we must point out the prohibitive difficulties of rigging the WTC complex for a 7-10 second destruction sequence with conventional or nuclear explosives, quite apart from the impossibility of explosives dustifying a million tons of steel and concrete without shattering window glass across the street. Explosives would create large chunks of debris plummeting onto the bathtub and shattering the slurry wall, not nanoparticles of dust.

But for truth’s sake we should not insist we know what we cannot know. We cannot know that the perps would not have used isolated large explosions detonated well before the 7-10 second destruction sequence.

“No More Games” — Yes. But incivility and refusal to recognize that people can disagree with you on some points without becoming immediately suspect of being gatekeepers or disinformation agents actually damages the cause of unpopular truth about 9/11 that you have courageously defended.

You, and Andrew Johnson, and even Dr. Judy Wood evince the same unfortunate tendency to refuse to allow others to agree only 40%, 60%, or 90%, to agree only on the fundamental issue that, as Dr. Wood so aptly put it, the destruction of the World Trade Center complex was not only a new Pearl Harbor, but simultaneously and most significantly a new Hiroshima. Give people a break!

Dr. Wood has brilliantly made the case for the use of directed free-energy technology to destroy the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. I agree with your assessment that Dr. Wood’s book “Where Did The Towers Go?” is a meticulous work of scientific analysis, and potentially one of the most important books ever written.

Why? Precisely because Dr. Wood shows the overwhelming evidence of the use of advanced technology based on a systematically-suppressed theory of physics that unifies electro-magnetism, gravity, and torsion.

She correctly connects the evidence of 9/11 to the theories and experiments of Nikola Tesla, Edward Leedskalnin, the US Navy’s World War II Philadelphia Experiement in radar invisibilty, John Hutchison’s repeatedly demonstrated effects, and A.N. Dmitriev’s theories of inhomogeneous vacuum domains and the electro-gravitic theory of tornadoes and other “self-luminous natural formations.”

Dr. Wood has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the WTC towers could not have been dustified in mid-air by high explosives, whether chemical or nuclear.

Your recent articles summarize her evidence concisely and cogently, but you follow Dr. Wood into the unnecessary, and counterfactual, insistence that because the almost noiseless, shockless dustification, persistently fuming cold rubble, intact bathtub, strange fires, toasted cars, low heat, impossibly contorted steel beams, missing marble facing, unbroken double-glazed windows with only the outer layer of glass perforated with small holes, levitated cars and people, cannot be explained by the effects of explosives of any kind, therefore no high-powered demolition-style explosives were actually detonated on 9/11 at any time, no matter what many credible eyewitnesses reported hearing, and feeling them, and seeing their unmistakable effects, long before the towers disappeared..

Exploding pressurized containers such as Scott Packs, and larger pressurized tanks on the utility levels of the towers may plausibly account for many of the booms that witnesses could have mistaken for exploding bombs or demolition charges, but it’s unsubstantiated for you to rule out all use of high explosives, either to supplement the dustification process, or to create a cover story plausible enough to entrap the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. You don’t make your case on this point.

You undermine the well-substantiated points that prove the use of directed free-energy technology beyond a reasonable doubt by being pig-headed about “no demolition-style explosions,” where even Dr. Wood uncharacteristcally goes astray.

It’s hard for many scientists, or for a philosopher of science like Dr. Jim Fetzer, to realize that academic science and archeology have been systematically subverted by the banking cartel, their tax-exempt foundations, and the military-industrial-black ops establishment, ever since the rediscovery, in the late 19th and early 20th century, of torsion physics, the alchemical transmutation of elements, and the true antiquity of human history on Earth and in the solar system.

Dr. Wood and her defenders, of whom I am one as Dr. Kevin Barrett will attest, need to move beyond the Hutchison Effect, valid and important though it is.

The use of directed free-energy technology on 9/11 is directly related to the theoretical and applied physics of the Haramein-Rauscher solution of Einstein’s field equations of General Relativity.

Dr. Joseph Farrell’s books document the modern rediscovery of alchemical transmutation of elements and torsion physics by the SS in Nazi Germany, and the relation of torsion physics to hyper-dimensional physics in the Kaluza-Klein unified field theory, in Einstein’s 1928 unified field theory, and in the theory and experiments of Soviet Russian physicist Anatoly Kosyrev.

Knowing “What” happened on 9/11/2001 reveals a much bigger truth about the political power founded on hiding and suppressing the truth of physics and human antiquity. Much is at stake in our time for humanity, and for common humanity’s natural predators, the ruthless natural “aristocracy” that stalk us.

[ I guess this will get me banned, but anyways, here goes] :

But Morgan, yourself [and Judy Wood, Steven Jones etc.] have all been busy analyzing the network equivalent of Hollywood movies – all of the various tower destruct videos are 100% computer generated fakes – every pixel
See: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=386&sid=90061e84dc1c837378f49f3fea37bc75 , and: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802&sid=90061e84dc1c837378f49f3fea37bc75

Regards, oneborneveryminute

Fact: every one of the alleged “live” media broadcasts [i.e. Fox, NBC,CBS ABC, CNN,MSNBC etc. etc.], including all of the WTC 1, 2 and 7 tower destruct sequences, are also complete, computer generated pre-fabrications [including sky, holes in buildings, all smoke, all explosions, entire backgrounds/foregrounds, shadows, etc. etc.] , as are all of their soundtracks.
See: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=386&sid=90061e84dc1c837378f49f3fea37bc75 , and: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802&sid=90061e84dc1c837378f49f3fea37bc75

Therefor, absolutely nothing can be realistically deduced from repeatedly watching them regarding exactly what brought down the WTC complex that day. [ All that such repeated watching _may_ accomplish is perhaps a heightened awareness of just how fake they all are- as impossible anomaly after impossible anomaly is revealed, once you know what to look for.]

Fact: in real life, tall buildings are never demolished “top down” as all of the [fake] MSM tower destruct sequences all depict, but from the bottom up: http://heiwaco.tripod.com/tower.htm

Fact: any experienced cop will tell you that “eye-witness” testimony is extremely unreliable, and that therefor, trying to “reasonably” deduce what brought down the WTC complex via entirely non cross-examined, alleged, “eye-witness” testimony, is just as futile and entirely non-scientific in methodology as is endlessly examining obviously faked videos and stills , as far as I can see.

Cherry- picking alleged witness testimony to support ones own favorite theory of what brought down the towers etc. is hopelessly transparent , and to my mind, diminishes the credibility of the person so doing.

FACT : on 9/11 the media was directly involved in the broadcasting of entirely fake imagery showing magic planes doing impossible things and magic buildings doing impossible things ; magic tricks that are only possible in Hollywood movies: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRyoFgAhW4c

Question: are all these endless, futile debates/arguments over what exactly was used to demolish the towers etc. , and which are all based on the examination of predominantly FAKE imagery, fake soundtracks and entirely unverifiable, non-cross examined “eye-witness” testimony, merely part of the controlled opposition, a “limited hangout” , deliberately designed to keep us arguing over virtually nothing, while distracting us from the _obvious_ : that practically all of the imagery seen by us all on 9/11 and thereafter was/is false, pre-manufactured, computer generated imagery that was deliberately broadcast by the media, in the manner approximately depicted in another Hollywood movie, “Wag The Dog”? : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNDmDZi05dY

Are the champions of DEW, thermate, or mini- nuclear style demolitions etc. etc. who post here and elsewhere no more than willing media/government dupes whose job is to distract from the “in your face” evidence of TOTAL media complicity in the alleged events of 9/11?

In truth, I don’t know the answer to that question either [no more than I know what destroyed the towers- outside of it _not_ being fake planes hitting them and alleged subsequent fires], but I am starting to have my suspicions regards, onebornfree

Now I say to conventional 911 Truthers:
We saw WTC 1 & 2 turn into dust right before our eyes-what kind of conventional controlled demolition can cause that? And how could those towers come down faster than free fall?
Reason: They didn’t fall down in the conventional sense–those towers turned into dust and blew away in the air and settled covering the ground of lower Manhattan. Sure there was some rubble at the bottom, but not enough to account for a conventional controlled demolition. The technology that was used to bring those towers down is not widely known about and certainly not by the general public. As Dr. Wood has said — free energy technology exists and “they” have weaponized it.

With all due respect, tall buildings are never demolished from the “top down”, for fairly simple logical reasons as explained here: http://heiwaco.tripod.com/tower.htm ,

…and with typical sequential results as depicted here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S21Uo39-IE

Meaning that it would _not_ “have taken an immense number of blasts, topdown, throughout the towers, given their massive size and strength, to bring them down and smash them into chunks.” as you claim, because in real life, it is never done that way.

Conventional bottom-up demolition, as required in _all_ tall building demolitions, where the necessarily far stronger base is taken out first, so that the weaker and lighter floors above can easily collapse downwards upon it and themselves, was all that was necessary, with no more than the usual amount of explosives required for a building of the dimensions and structure of either WTC tower.

Morgan Reynolds said: “… Watch and listen carefully to any video of tower destruction you like, ”

[1] If you are referring specifically to the 9/11 tower MSM or “amateur” destruction videos, watching them [or even listening to them! ] is a complete waste of time because they are all fraudulent, nothing more than computerized movie graphics essentially no different from the Hollywood movie “Independence Day”[1996]. This includes all 7 of the claimed “real” WTC videos you have linked to at the top of this very blog entry.

In other words, they are complete fabrications [i.e. every pixel, and every "soundtrack" that accompanies them is fraudulent]. “Independence Day” clip [top down destruct sequence] here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRyoFgAhW4c

For “proof” of my claim [i.e. that all of the 9/11 tower destruction videos and their related soundtracks are computer generated frauds] , see here [currently 18 pages of very detailed WTC tower destruct video analysis]:
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802&sid=25a2ea3e6e3e23840634ce0d5fe46238

[2] Morgan Reynolds said: “… Watch and listen carefully to any video of tower destruction you like, ”

If, on the other hand, you were instead referring to _non_ 9/11 tower collapse video sequences, then I have already provided a link to a video record of a typical [i.e. bottom up] tall building demolition , and also a link to a site that explains exactly why, for scientific reasons, to be effective, all tall building destruct demolition sequences start from the bottom of the building and proceed upwards.

Regards, onebornfree.

Q1: What is this place- some sort of tedious, name-calling club? Does doing so somehow make a posters argument more weighty? What happens, you make up some sort of childish, retarded name and you get an award ,or points, perhaps Is this type of behavior some sort of requirement for a Judy Wood fan club membership? To me it is both childish and irrelevant.

Q2: So what are “the central issues” that I have so skillfully [if, admittedly, somewhat verbosely] avoided, according to you, Mr Johnson? Regards, onebornfree.

Wow. Everything you need is here. Time to “put up” or “shut up” (actually, that time was about 4 years ago.)

1- Do you think Israel was involved at all?

2- Many people believe that it was the Illuminati/Freemasons who are the shadow government because of politicians photographed doing the devil horn sign and because of the numerology surrounding 9/11. Could this be true or is it disinfo?

Thanks again