Click an interview to listen, or right-click (control-click on a Mac) to save to your computer.
- Morgan Reynolds discusses Keynesian Economics & 9/11 with Kevin Barrett February 10, 2012
- Debate: Morgan Reynolds vs. Chuck Boldwyn on Jim Fetzer’s Real Deal Radio Show February 6, 2012
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer September 2011
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Doug Herrick: Inner Views Radio Show September 8, 2011 Part 1 Part 2
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer – 9/11 Science and Discussion of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – Real Deal Radio Show – June 21, 2011
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer – 9/11 Science – Real Deal Radio Show – June 10, 2011
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer – Faking Osama’s Death / 9/11 Science – Real Deal Radio Show – May 9, 2011
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer – “Where Did the Towers Go?” – Real Deal Radio Show – April 6, 2011
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer – 9/11, U.S. economy, JFK – January 26, 2011
- Jim Fetzer interviews no planers Reynolds, Grable, Haupt and Carter on June 4, 2010 in tribute to Gerard Holmgren, RIP
- Morgan Reynolds interviewed by Jim Fetzer – Real Deal Radio Show – April 28, 2010
- Jim Fetzer & Morgan Reynolds – WTC Destruction – ‘Dynamic Duo’ – 06 Dec 2006
- Morgan Reynolds – 9-11 Plane Issues etc – Jim Fetzer – Dynamic Duo 03 Apr 2007
- Prof Morgan Reynolds – Prof Jim Fetzer – No Big Planes on 9-11 – The Dynamic Duo – 28 Feb 07
- Prof Kevin Barret – Prof Morgan Reynolds – Rick Rajter – No Planes / TV Fakery Controversy
- Morgan Reynolds – No Planes – Cloak and Dagger – 27 Aug 2007
- Prof Morgan Reynolds – No Planes – Cloak and Dagger – 5 Sept 2007
- Morgan Reynolds – Madison 9-11 Science Conference – 05 Aug 2007
- Ace Baker – 9-11 Video Fakery – Dynamic Duo – 27 Sep 2007
- Prof Morgan Reynolds and Jim Fetzer – NIST and Newtons Laws – Dynamic Duo – 18 Oct 2007
- Prof Morgan Reynolds – Jim Fetzer – NIST and Newton Part 2 – Dynamic Duo 23 Oct 2007
- Dr. Judy Wood and Ambrose Lane–WTC and DEW–26 October 2007 Part 1 of 2
- Dr. Judy Wood and Ambrose Lane–WTC and DEW–26 October 2007 Part 2 of 2
- Judy Wood – Kevin Barrett – Truth Jihad Radio – 27 Oct 2007
- Prof Morgan Reynolds – Discusses DEW and K Barrett and 911 Research – Dynamic Duo 30 Oct 2007
- Prof Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo – Response to Anthony Lawson – 28 Nov 2007
- Jeff Hill interviews Bill Pitts of NIST, October 9, 2007
- Mark Thornton and Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo 10 Jan 2008
- Jeff Hill and Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo 09 Jan 2008
- John Lear and Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo 08 Jan 2008
- Ace Baker – Media Fakery Timeline Dynamic Duo – 15 Jan 2008
- Dr Gary North – Recession and US Economy – Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo 05 Feb 2008
- Dr Pam Freyd – False Memory Syndrome – Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo – 06 Feb 2008
- Dr Judy Wood – 9-11 and The Hutchison Effect – Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo – 07 Feb 2008
- Alan Stang – Morgan Reynolds – Dynamic Duo – 19 Feb 2008
Hello Dr.Reynolds MORGAN,
About the problem understanding how the planes could have penetrated the WTC buildings…If any plane ever did.
Well ,I was wondering if the alleged planes could indeed have penetrated the towers due to the possible caracteristics
of these DEW.It could be possible via the peculiar behaving of straw planted into trees or wood observed during hurricans…I guess that switching on this DEW-device(s) could allow this to happen:the towers or/and the planes could have been altered in this peculiar state discribed in some of Huntchinson experiences which show aluminum inbeded into iron or wood into iron…??!!
Respectfully
Panzone Alessandro
Luxembourg(Europe
Two problems immediately render your scenario improbable in the extreme, impossible really: timing and accuracy must be perfect. The garage door opening or softening from a DEW or other device must occur just before plane entry, and the weight above the opening/softening must still be supported without tilt or “slump.” Moreover, each airliner must hit its respective opening/softening precisely in order to enter each building without a violent collision displacing wings, tail, or any other parts, as seen in the (fake) videos. Experienced pilots could not hit a 208′ wide building on simulators, despite repeated attempts, at the (impossible for airliners) speeds alleged, much less a precise space on such a wall. Another thing is that the holes were undersized: they are not large enough to swallow a Boeing 767, same as the Pentagon and Shanksville holes. That’s why amid its 10,000 pages the NIST report on the twin towers never gave the dimensions of the tower holes.
An interesting corollary to your query however is what the heck were the “flashes” seen at each tower immediately before the plane image hits? That’s a topic for another day.