On Flying a Jetliner into a Building

On Flying a Jetliner into a Building

By 

Morgan Reynolds

May 16, 2016

So is this a good idea?  Businessman raising £1m to recreate 9/11 to prove conspiracy theories true or false ‘once and for all’–Mirror Online

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/businessman-raising-1m-recreate-911-7981317

It is a good idea if and only if this kind of “crash experiment” approximates the official crash story.  Critical conditions would include:

  • Use a Boeing 767 rather than the larger 747
  • Use a hell-strong steel/concrete skyscraper
  • Fly the 767 at more than 500 mph near sea level

Oops, condition three presents a major problem because it is impossible to fly an airliner 500+ mph near sea level.  The official story is busted right there.  

But by all means, you go boy, rev up those motors and go as fast as you can.  No stinkin’ building even needed because the Big 9/11 Lie would be exposed by falling far short of safely flying 500+ mph near sea level.  Why is that?  Because the air poses three times the resistance that it does at 35,000 feet.  And that’s a real drag, I mean a prohibitive drag, for an airliner (pun intended).   

This entry was posted in 911. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to On Flying a Jetliner into a Building

  1. roadofcobras says:

    Heh! “Live” on 9/11: ABC’s Impossible “Spinning Towers”:

  2. dmdeedee says:

    Hell yes indeed. Pilots for 9/11 truth in the very first months after the event stated on their website that it was impossible for a plane that large to fly at that altitude at that speed. After some time, they shut up, the website mentioned nothing and no one spoke of it ever again in all these years.
    The power of the secret clan running the nation is quite evident in matters just like this.

    • dachsielady says:

      Pilots for 9/11 Truth abandoned the plane truth about 9-1 I would say sometime around April of 2012.

      Here are two articles that will shed some light on the matter.

      Reason and Rationality in Public Debate: The Case of Rob Balsamo

      http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/reason-and-rationality-in-public-debate-the-case-of-rob-balsamo/

      By Jim Fetzer on May 1, 2015

      (NOTE: this article was originally posted by Dr. Fetzer to VT site I think in 2012. Then VT removed all of Dr. Fetzer’s articles and then reposted some of them, this one included, and gave this one a newer date of 2015. I do not see that Dr. Fetzer transferred this particular article to his own website, JamesFetzer.blogspot.com so it only remains on Veterans Today with, I think, an incorrect date. I posted a comment on the original VT article and website in April of 2012, using my real name, but I guess those comments now are either deleted or are only available to people who register and sign in anew.)

      ____________

      Also this article elaborates a bit on Rob Balsamo’s retreat from 9-11 plane truth.

      http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/search?q=balsamo
      Monday, September 28, 2015
      9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II
      by Jim Fetzer

      Excerpt:

      “Those who want to contest these findings are going to have to refute Bureau of Transportation Statistics data that shows Flights 11 and 77 were not even scheduled to fly that day and FAA registration data showing that the planes corresponding to Flights 93 and 175 were not de-registered until 28 September 2005. Since they prove that none of the “official plane crashes” actually took place―which defines “NPT” (or “No Planes Theory”), when it is properly understood―they find themselves in good company, because no less an expert than Rob Balsamo, the head of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, whose own society has established some of these key findings, has declared that Pilots will never accept NPT―apparently, regardless of the evidence! We all know planes are shown in those videos, but, whatever they may be, they cannot be Flight 11 and Flight 175. I am not implying that Rob is an agent of disinformation; rather that, by succumbing to the temptation to substitute his personal preferences for objective proof, he has become one more in a long line of “useful idiots” who are incapable of reasoning from premises to the conclusions they support.”
      ______________

      My beginning study 9-11 began on 9-11-01, and from that time I identified “no planes” as the litmus test I would adhere to in all of my study.
      Today, I noticed that G. Edward Griffin’s Red Pill Conference, June 21, 22, Bozeman Montana,\ , https://redpillexpo.org/
      will have Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth as one of its :world class” speakers.

      As much as I respect most of the speakers of that upcoming conference, I discount the entire conference now because I see that Richard Gage is regarded as a truthteller about 9-11.

      This Red Pill event is just another Blue Pill event.

      • dmdeedee says:

        That is some long VT article by Fetzer. I could not bare to read it all and stopped about 1/4 of the way through.
        I do know that much of everything has been and continues to be scrubbed from the Internet of any real value and truth having to do with 9/11. If an article wasn’t downloaded that revealed major truths it is now gone. The Jews as the main writers and publishers have been rewriting history for centuries and rewriting how past events were documented have gone through the same series of scrubbing.

      • dachsielady says:

        One more thing.

        I often “had a problem” calling certain data points about 9-11 I found over the years “evidence” or “fact” or “truth”, and increasingly tried to just reserve those strong words for more solidly attested data.

        But data that THEY murder a person for discovering establishes the data as truth and evidence and fact, at least in my way of thinking.

        Gerard Holmgren died at the age of 51 on May 2, 2010 of cancer. He discovered records from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) and from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administation (FAA) that established as fact and evidence…

        “Thus of the four allegedly hijacked planes , two didn’t exist, and the other two were diverted to safe landings.”
        http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id277.html

        MANUFACTURED TERRORISM
        THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11

        By Gerard Holmgren
        holmgren@nettrade.com.au
        April 18 2004
        ___________________

        “Gerard only found out 2 weeks ago that he had inoperable cancer”
        a May 2010 Facebook posting of Nico Haupt,”

        http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2010/05/wow-gerard-holmgren-passes-away.html

        Two weeks notice means fulminant cancer. (Occurring suddenly, rapidly, and with great severity or intensity), the same descriptor of the kinds of cancer that Jack Ruby and several others who were “about to testify” died of.

        The notion of no planes is killing material.

        What THEY will kill over is a big clue in finding 9-11 fact and evidence.

  3. onebornfree says:

    “No stinkin’ building even needed because the Big 9/11 Lie would be exposed by falling far short of safely flying 500+ mph near sea level. Why is that? Because the air poses three times the resistance that it does at 35,000 feet.”

    Exactly.

    Questions for you:

    if a famous US network sequence showing the supposed crash of Fl 175 into the South tower revealed a frame to frame speed of 540mph, and yet that speed is entirely impossible at that altitude[ as you stated], does that imply that the entire “live” sequence was/is a fabrication, or only that the plane image itself was/is a fabrication, as some [eg Ace Baker] contend?

    See: “Fl. 175’s Speed: Fairbanks [290+ mph] or Fox [540 + mph]? “:
    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2015/10/fl-175s-speed-fairbanks-327-mph-or-fox.html

    Regards, onebornfree

  4. yankee451 says:

    Hey Morgan, remember this?

  5. A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART ONE

    A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART TWO

    “When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross”

  6. Robert E. Salt says:

    All that money could be put to far better use. There’s enough facts known about 9/11 that would be spreading like wildfire if people could handle the truth,

  7. danny young says:

    HOW CAN ALUMINUM TEAR THROUGH CONCRETE AND STEEL? 911 MAKES NO SENSE! AND WHERE WAS NORAD ON THAT DAY MY GOD you know why did not see any planes cause there was no planes we have been scamed!

  8. dachsielady says:

    Dr. Morgan Reynolds, always was and always will be king of No Planes Theory [NPT].

    Nobody does it better!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s