by
Morgan Reynolds
In the aftermath of the massacre in Orlando this weekend, Justin Raimondo, Editorial Director at Antiwar.com, displayed his best schuck’n jive on 9/11 again, bobbing and weaving nicely. He wrote: “After all these years, we are still feeling the aftershocks of 9/11, and they will continue for quite some time. The task of libertarians and other advocates of civil liberties and a noninterventionist foreign policy is to resist the forces of unreason to the best of our ability, without hesitation or compromise – no matter which way the winds of public opinion are blowing – while still defending the security of the country and its citizens.”
Praise for Raimondo’s first sentence since, yes, we are “feeling the aftershocks of 9/11, and they will continue for quite some time.” OK but why must negative aftershocks continue for “quite some time”? They need not but the answer lies in applying a simple truth stated by Ayn Rand: “To act against the facts of reality can result only in destruction.” (Harry Binswanger, ed., The Ayn Rand Lexicon, p. 531). Nearly a decade and a half of action (aggression) based on false belief in the (impossible) official government 9/11 conspiracy theory has resulted “only in destruction.” More of the same is baked in the cake unless the Big 9/11 Lie is exposed by many more writers relying on facts.
The cause of destruction is even hidden within Raimondo’s second sentence. Most of us applaud resistance to the “forces of unreason to the best of our ability, without hesitation or compromise–no matter…public opinion.” Huzzah for intellectual courage, but does Raimondo display these virtues? On 9/11 he goes wobbly, passively accepting the prevailing conspiracy theory despite overwhelming facts to refute it. As I wrote at the end of last year on this site (“Cunning Pretexts…“), there is a long history of government frauds to produce wars and unless more writers like Raimondo strike at this familiar root of evil with evidence, the horrors of 9/11-derived destruction will continue.
nomoregames.net 
Dr. Reynolds and Dr. Wood have done commendable work, yet I favor an alternative theory: the destruction of WTC1&2 was an extraterrestrial punitive strike. The fake plane videos, the later demolitions of lesser WTC buildings, the Pentagon attack, the “Let’s Roll” shootdown, all were part of the coverup, the “cockroaches scurrying when the lights come on”, Hutchison is, I think, the last member of this “bodyguard of lies”, enabling the final lie that the U.S./Israel government did it with “black technology”. Hutchison is a charlatan who never really tells you anything – and my freshman physics course was taught by the inventor of NMR, so I know what it is like to have advanced, applied physics explained to high school graduates by someone who is not a charlatan. The “shadow government” would rather be blamed for 9/11, than admit that ET gave them a spanking.
I’m sorry to hear about the assassination of Dr. Wood’s graduate student in Minneapolis, and the suspicious early cancer death of Gerard (Gerald) Holmgren.
has you or as you read this the U.K. just spoke out about the illegal war in Iraq . 2002 ,they go on to say , the U.K. used false information . Washington Post .
Professor Laurence Tribe of Harvard had an editorial the other day , protesting the Foreign (money ) influence on our poetics .
I am not an intellectual , so i asked him ( he is a Constitutional Guru ) whehe he stood on 911 Commissioner’s , Jamie Gorelick’s Perjury with ACFD Chief Ed Plaugher ( Pentagon ) . He answered her three statements ,( not questions ) with “yes mam , and that’s correct , then she asked him to elaborate .A well written response aimed at showing NYFD , OEM , NYPD , did not have a “unified command “.
Page 315 of the 911 Report contradicts every thing he said .His command is torn apart by the Arlington County Commissions After Action Report .
Just the facts please.
Molyneux is an intelligent man, but so are hundreds of physics professors who won’t go near the subject. I’ve noticed a paradox about right wing commentators. While they will argue vehemently against collectivism, social security, welfare and the tyranny of government, when it comes to the implication of the CIA in, say, the JFK assassination, that’s rejected out of hand. They seek shelter in the very entity they despise, because, let’s face it, you’re safe there. Chris Hedges took a chance and told the truth about Iraq. He soon had almost not livelihood. Luckily RT.com just gave him a job so he can buy groceries. Hedges looks superficially at 911. Michio Kaku almost goes cataleptic when confronted with 911.
To accept a deep conspiracy is too much for even the most intelligent American. We have been waving the flag so long,and accepting the myth of our superiority so long, that there isn’t enough Prozac to assuage our disappointment
Fine comment. Lots of those Libertarian/libertarian guys are very intelligent, but intelligence does not equal truth.
I noticed all our local libertarians and “right wingers” of various kinds totally accepted 9-11 at the time of the event. Then various strains of 9-11 truther groups evolved and the main false one took precedence for about nine years until the lid was fully blown on the nanothermite gang.
ONEBORNFREE; IF I AM READING CORRECTLY , IS CORRECT . YOU SHOULD LOOK AT CONSENSUS911.COM ; GREWAT ORGANIZERS OF MATERIAL , AND PROOF READING DR. GRIFFIN’S BOOKS . THEY HAVE EVERY 911 GROUP ( TRUTH ) IMAGINABLE . BUT , I TOLD THEM THEY ARE WRITING RIGHT OVER 99% OF THE POPULATION . PUT IT OUT THERE IN SIMPLE TERMS . I CAN’T READ HIS BOOKS , BECAUSE IN ONE BOOK ,HE MENTIONED CANAVAN , SLINEY AND BELGER ,USING INFORMATION THAT WAS NOT CORRECT .
GRAHAM AND CLARKE WROTE BOOKS WITHOUT MENTIONING THE FAA .
THE TOP FOUR EXECUTIVES AT THE FAA ON 911 , ALL WENT RTO WORK FOR METRON AVIATION . ( AIRBUS ) BELGER , KIES , SLINEY ,GARVEY, : CANAVAN WENT TO ANTHEON ( dig within , Ryan ) , which became ALION , CYBER SECURITY , HAS PRESIDENT .
PAYS TO GOOF OFF ; EVERYONE ELSE AT THE FAA WDERE PROMOTED .
…does Raimondo display these virtues? On 9/11 he goes wobbly, passively accepting the prevailing conspiracy theory despite overwhelming facts to refute it. ”
In my experience, as a former “libertarian” and “anarcho-capitalist who now self-describes as only a “radical individualist” in order to be no longer associated with total 9/11 morons such as Raimondo, his [Raimondo’s] ignorant waffling is “par for the course” amongst the so-called “libertarian” and “anarcho-capitalist” crowd.
It’s a joke! He is either just extremely ignorant or just a moron on this issue – just like at least 95% of the so called “libertarian” and anarcho-capitalist crowd.
For example, here’s Stefan Molyneux, another “famous” apparent “anarcho-capitalist” 9/11 moron:
“The 9/11 Conspiracy Debate! Yes, Really. “:
One has to laugh at the outright absurdity of self-described “libertarian-anarcho-capitalists” etc. like Molyneux who are foaming-at-the-mouth defenders/parroters of the official [i.e. government] 9/11 story in _any_ form.
“Principled anarchists” who believe the government story- what a frickin’ laugh ! 🙂 .
In fact, [and both ironically and sadly], foaming-at-the-mouth radical marxist/ leftists such as Peter Joseph actually seem to be far more aware of the reasons for 9/11 and similar and their outright fraudulence than a Raimondo or a Molyneux can ever hope to be 🙂
Joseph’s excellent [although flawed] movie “Zeitgeist” hits the 9/11 nail right on the head :
…….despite the fact that Joseph’s Marxist “solutions” [ outlined in some of his other movies] make absolutely no sense whatsoever [as Molyneux at least has the sense to point out elsewhere] .
And so it goes…
Regards, onebornfree
http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/
“passively accepting the prevailing conspiracy theory despite overwhelming facts to refute it”
I notice that all of the lesser of two evils accept the official story. That makes them all a lot less lesser so I will actively reject any communication on the subject of political candidates for any office.