On Flying a Jetliner into a Building

On Flying a Jetliner into a Building

By 

Morgan Reynolds

May 16, 2016

So is this a good idea?  Businessman raising £1m to recreate 9/11 to prove conspiracy theories true or false ‘once and for all’–Mirror Online

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/businessman-raising-1m-recreate-911-7981317

It is a good idea if and only if this kind of “crash experiment” approximates the official crash story.  Critical conditions would include:

  • Use a Boeing 767 rather than the larger 747
  • Use a hell-strong steel/concrete skyscraper
  • Fly the 767 at more than 500 mph near sea level

Oops, condition three presents a major problem because it is impossible to fly an airliner 500+ mph near sea level.  The official story is busted right there.  

But by all means, you go boy, rev up those motors and go as fast as you can.  No stinkin’ building even needed because the Big 9/11 Lie would be exposed by falling far short of safely flying 500+ mph near sea level.  Why is that?  Because the air poses three times the resistance that it does at 35,000 feet.  And that’s a real drag, I mean a prohibitive drag, for an airliner (pun intended).   

This entry was posted in 911. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to On Flying a Jetliner into a Building

  1. onebornfree says:

    “No stinkin’ building even needed because the Big 9/11 Lie would be exposed by falling far short of safely flying 500+ mph near sea level. Why is that? Because the air poses three times the resistance that it does at 35,000 feet.”

    Exactly.

    Questions for you:

    if a famous US network sequence showing the supposed crash of Fl 175 into the South tower revealed a frame to frame speed of 540mph, and yet that speed is entirely impossible at that altitude[ as you stated], does that imply that the entire “live” sequence was/is a fabrication, or only that the plane image itself was/is a fabrication, as some [eg Ace Baker] contend?

    See: “Fl. 175’s Speed: Fairbanks [290+ mph] or Fox [540 + mph]? “:
    http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.com/2015/10/fl-175s-speed-fairbanks-327-mph-or-fox.html

    Regards, onebornfree

  2. yankee451 says:

    Hey Morgan, remember this?

  3. A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART ONE

    A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART TWO

    “When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross”

  4. Robert E. Salt says:

    All that money could be put to far better use. There’s enough facts known about 9/11 that would be spreading like wildfire if people could handle the truth,

  5. danny young says:

    HOW CAN ALUMINUM TEAR THROUGH CONCRETE AND STEEL? 911 MAKES NO SENSE! AND WHERE WAS NORAD ON THAT DAY MY GOD you know why did not see any planes cause there was no planes we have been scamed!

  6. dachsielady says:

    Dr. Morgan Reynolds, always was and always will be king of No Planes Theory [NPT].

    Nobody does it better!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s