Submit a question for Morgan using the comment form below:
I’ve got a question about 9/11 concerning the various people who rolled out the official government storyline on TV that day. To what degree did they understand what was happening? In other words, which reporters and witnesses do you think were “in on it?”
June 6, 2011
That’s a good question John. It must be good because the short answer is I do not know, in most cases, which TV personalities and witnesses were in on it from the git-go and which were not. The reason: I was not “in on” the planning or execution of the crime. I cannot, in other words, at this stage offer proof beyond a reasonable doubt as to who was consciously “shilling” for the government and who was not.
Nonetheless, your question deserves some thought and informed speculation. As a general proposition, we know the broadcast media were in on 9/11, that these people are the “enforcement arm of the powers that be,” in the immortal words of Joe Keith. 9/11 was first and foremost a “psy op,” the greatest lie ever sold, and that means the media was central to the plot, as they always have been in major government scams.
Jesse Ventura says, “There is enough meat on this bone to begin making arrests.” I agree. So if I were a prosecutor I would form a grand jury and begin making arrests of media personnel and witnesses on relevant fraud and conspiracy charges, grill them as best I could, expose their contradictions and lies, break ’em down and make a case against. Who was “in on it” based on initial evidence? I would start with these fake eye witness accounts:
Sean Murtagh, CNN Vice President of Finance, conveniently called in the first report to CNN claiming a (fictional) airliner flew by him at 5 Penn Plaza and crashed into the WTC North Tower, one of the modest few in NYC that morning to claim such an event happened and thereby good ol’ Sean hardwired the airliner flight 11 myth into the American psyche.
This video also points out that George W. Bush is one of the rare witnesses who claims he saw a plane fly into the North Tower too, on TV no less. How he could have done that goes unexplained since there was no known broadcast of the North Tower hit, nor do we have any corroboration from witnesses around the president to support his story. Notice in the video all the alleged eye witnesses interviewed by the media uniformly say that a plane hit at about the 80th floor, even if they were at street level!? They all must be speaking from the same talking points.
The next day the media acquired the Naudet brothers or so-called firefighter (six-second) video, thereby cementing the fiction that an airliner crashed into the North Tower.
Beginning with Sean M. the media on 9/11 interviewed other (alleged) eyewitness media to sell the airliner fiction. It was a nicely controlled situation, including the following:
Rose Marie Arce, CNN producer: http://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-eyewitness-report-cards.html
Theresa Renaud, wife of CBS Early Show producer Jack Renaud: http://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-eyewitness-report-cards_05.html
Don Dahler, ABC correspondent: http://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-eyewitness-report-cards_12.html
Kai Simonsen, alleged Fox News reporter: http://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-eyewitness-report-cards_16.html
Then we have other lyin’ 9/11 eyewitnesses to interview in a most hostile manner like Stanley Praimnath and the Harley T-shirt guy (actor, “Fox freelancer”) Mark Humphrey. So I would take a “bottom-up” approach to prosecuting the corporate media for selling the 9/11 lie rather than beginning at the top with media CEOs.
As Still Diggin’ sums up, “When I began to look into the background of the ‘eyewitnesses’ who ‘called in’ to the various networks, I invariably found that even those people who appeared to be ‘common folk’ were anything but. They were either tied to the media or big business.”
June 9, 2011
More in response to your question about media and witness participation in the 9/11 hoax: a Florida appeals court ruled in 2003 that falsifying the news is not against the law: http://search4beauty.blogspot.com/2007/02/fox-news-has-no-legal-obligation-to_21.html and http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/11-the-media-can-legally-lie/. Further, FCC regulations do not seem to hamper deliberate deception by the corporate media http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title47/47tab_02.tpl. Two lessons seem obvious: 1) news buyer beware, and 2) prosecution of the corporate media and lying witnesses for their participation in the 9/11 conspiracy appears legally hopeless.
June 13, 2011
Hello Dr. I’d like to know if you have considered the possibility of the missile-disguissed-as-a-plane theory? (the missile wouldn’t be a regular one, we are talking about a cruise missile, penetration and stealth, and military drone plane swaping technology) Thanks
Here, take look at this
TRUMP AN EXPERT ON BUILDINGS , SAID ON 911 ; A PLANE COULD NOT DO THAT , IT HAD TO BE BOMBS ; BOMBS IT WAS , THE FIREMEN WERE NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY . THEY WITNESSED EXPLOSIONS EVERY WHERE .
SPEAKING OF PEOPLE JUMPING OUT OF WINDOWS , NO WAY . THEY WERE BLOWN OUT BY EXPLOSIONS , IF THEY DID INDEED “FLY ” OT THE WINDOWS .
Hello, Dr. Reynolds you have said that that aluminum jet liner would not penetrate the steel structure of the World Trade Centers. But back in World War 2 an American medium bomber had crashed into the Empire State Building, erupting a fire for 40 floors.So if a piston powered aircraft can penetrate the Empire State 200mph while a Boeing jetliner supposedly crashed into the WTC going from 465mph and blown it up.
If there were no planes in 9/11 what happened to the specific airframes that supposedly crashed? I’m interested in this theory, but I haven’t seen this discussed before.
RE: PLANES OR BOMBS AT WTC . ASK MR. PRESIDENT TRUMP ; ON THE INTERNET FIND HIS REMARKS TO REPORTERS IN N.Y. ( PLANES COULD NOT PENETRATE WTC . WINDOWS WERE SO SMALL , ALL STEEL BETWEEN THEM , IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN BOMBS ,. ( SEE GWB VIDEO ON YOU TUBE , KSM TOLD HIM , THAT BOMBS WERE PLACED WAY UP , WAY UP HIGH , SO NO ONE COULD ESCAPE GOING UP . ? WHAT THE HECK. TWO PRESIDENTS SAYING THE SAME THING . BOTH BIG LIARS . RUNNING 1&2 FOR THE WORSE . THEY BOTH TELL THE TRUTH AND NO ONE HEARS THEM ( HEARD THEM ) CRY FOR HELP .
No plane crashes implies no “specific airframes” either. What is there to discuss?
is it true that morgan reynolds is actually gene hackman the actor …
Best wishes for 2020 and the great beyond Morgan..I Hope you’re keeping well. I’m considering the possibility..amongst multiple possibilities.. that the technologies that exist that showed the world that huge amounts of matter can be valently disassociated, (Dr Woods’ Dustification) ..COULD also allow the matter of jet airliners to dissolve into the matter of the buildings? Not totally distant to some of Hutchisons’ spoons into metal et al phenomena?…. Disturbing as the positioning of the recording event, of the plane entering the building seems to be.
No one says that the heat of the jet fuel fires melted the beams.
The fires in the twin towers were started by the jet fuel
but that would have burned off fairly quickly.
The fuel for the fires was not onlyall the office furniture
but all the plastic /luggage contained in the jets that hit the building.
why do you guys always ignore this. Have you seen plastic burn, don’t forget it is made from oil (clue)
next time you sit in a plane look at the sheer volume of combustibles inside the cabin
the lockers the seats, the carpets and imagine all the combustible items in the cargo bay.
this is not a minor point.
You need to address this if you want to be taken seriously.
Your proposition presumes the planes “entered” the buildings..to have their fuel and other contents burn “inside” the buildings does it not? So now you must explain how, against accepted laws of physics; HOW the planes ENTERED the building??
Your suggestion that the plane is too soft to pierce the buildings
is based on “common sense”
which goes out the window as soon as we encounter events outside of human scale ,
Can a table tennis ball ever penetrate the paddle ? no you would say.
Have a look at this video
WTF I can hear you say, by your reasoning it should not be possible
Or how can water cut through solid steel water is softer than steel.
look at this
I am no physicist, but its all to do with the velocity of the projectile and its Kinetic energy given by K.E. = 1/2 mass x velocity squared
Which in the plane’s or the ball’s case from the video make it a very large number,
That energy is instantly turned into heat and sound in unimaginably massive amounts
generating vast destruction at the impact point,the plane is destroyed but its mass doesn’t simply disappear , it also has quite a lot of momentum,that combined with
the huge heat instantly generated overcomes the resistance of the walls.
As I said I am not qualified you will find this is more or less what happens in cases such as this.
It is the kinetic energy that is the issue. (clue.. its proportional the the square of the velocity, )
If the planes traveled at 10kph they would hardly damage the building
but at the high speed of the impact all that energy needs to be dissipated in a very short amount of time.
Also don’t forget F=M x A
in the planes case A is also a very large number as the plan De-accelrated
in an extremely short amount of time
So you have very high forces to plug into newtons third law.
huge forces and vast amounts of energy involved .you need to get your head around those issues.
Also re the furphy about the planes speed at sea level
Can you please explain mach numbers how these relate to a planes performance
Also laminar and non laminar flow
Also the speed quoted is not the max speed possible at sea level but the max safe speed.
IE the air frame would fatigue at such speeds over time but not in a short 5- 10 minute burst.
please reference where this would say otherwise.
I would ask you to address these issues.
Your propositions are flawed..You mistakenly, or deliberately, are trying to deceive. The planes were not supersonic..and neither is “water” cutting the steel. Water is the medium being used to carry particulates that are harder than the steel that are cutting the steel. If you believe what you have deposed here then you are a dilettante or a fool..And if you are no fool..then you are a shill.
The commentary, beginning with: “Hello Morgan,
Recently ‘discovered’ your interesting site. I would like to comment on your 07/14/2017, commentary entitled, “Another Catastrophic Plane Crash Proves 9/11 Plane Fakery.” was made by Frank… now it’s not an anonymously made comment.
Recently ‘discovered’ your interesting site. I would like to comment on your 07/14/2017, commentary entitled, “Another Catastrophic Plane Crash Proves 9/11 Plane Fakery.”
Having been an aircraft accident investigator motivates and allows me to provide the following comments; hopefully they’ll aid you in your understanding about aircraft crashes. First, and it’s a no brainer, no two accident sites/crashes are alike.
The photographs you provided with your article show a large airplane in what appears to be an inverted position. If correct, the question, “How did it get into that position?,” is asked. It appears as though all the major airframe components at within the main ground collision point. Regardless, the wreckage pictures you provided show a relatively low speed ground collision. One of your photographs show vegetation damage “ahead” of the main wreckage. This suggests there was slight forward movement of the airplane when it collided with the ground.
Once the airplane’s fuel cells are compromised during the collision, much of the fuel atomizes and can ignite as it appears it did in the photographs; fuel which didn’t atomize just burns. As I recall, the C-130 could have had a special foam in its wing fuel cells that would prevent atomization. Even so, the wreckage and ground damage appear to be confined to a small area suggesting a loss of airplane control with a subsequent “pancaking” onto the ground. With a low speed ground collision there will be more parts of the airplane and occupants to examine, unless there’s an overwhelming fire. Even with that kind of fire there will be remains of some sort of remains to examine. I know because I’ve investigated quite a few burn-up/down accidents similar to this.
The accident you call attention to in your article will normally have some sort of identifiable human and aircraft remains available for inspection due to the low-force nature of the ground collision. Yes, in a case like this one, most of the remains will be burnt to one degree or another; but they’d still have some investigative use/value. The key point I’m making is that the accident you use as an example to question the 9/11 crashes is like comparing apples with oranges.
The two airplanes striking the Twin Towers were flying at a much higher speed while flying forward. The fireballs observed are consistent with fuel atomization and ignition. This FACT refutes the government-media complexes drivel about the fuel fire lasting long enough to weaken the Tower’s structural steel members and thereby leading to the “collapse.” The airliner fuselages would have penetrated the Tower’s “thin” outer walls and go “X” distances inside depending upon resistance met.
Look at the airline airplane as a long, skinny, THIN aluminum tube with a pointy end. The wings are flattened versions of the aluminum tube made sometimes with thin composite materials. When the airline-type airplane collides with an immovable object like the towers it will penetrate the outer surface and part of its internal area (those walls are considerably thinner than the Pentagon’s and are made up of some sort of p[recast concrete, stone with glass windows). In this case, it can be fairly presumed that during the collision sequence the thin aluminum and aluminum/composite airplane components are shredded/destroyed beginning at the collision point and during what forward movement that occurred. Humans and baggage will undergo the transformation from wholeness to various-sized pieces during this sequence. I’ve seen it plenty of times to know what I’m speaking about.
The ground areas beneath the collision and subsequent penetration points on the Towers should have had pieces of the airplane’s airframe and engines resting upon it. But, when the Towers were taken down, the debris covered anything that may have been laying there. And, of course, who would have been focusing upon the airplane debris at that point? Who even asked? Are there any pictures showing the debris piles or what was observed during the Tower debris removal? There should have been some debris. The questions are: Who thought to look for airplane debris amongst the piles of building debris? Could shredded airplane occupant and baggage remains be identified amongst the building debris? Was there even an attempt to do so?
I happen to believe the crashes into the Towers were real; whether the airplanes were under human guidance as some would like us to believe, or under some form of remote control is a matter of conjecture. The crash in PA makes me wonder since certain components of the airplane were found a considerable distance beyond the airplane’s ground collision point.
The Shanksville “accident” site shows what a high speed ground collision usually looks like. The best one could expect to find during an investigation of a site like this would be are possibly small pieces of human and baggage remains as well as those of the airplane; hopefully the all important “black” boxes. Sometimes, in cases like this one, depending upon many factors, one might find an airplane component, maybe even part of the airplane’s tail section.
The Pentagon “accident” site did not show any airplane debris on the grounds. The one item some pointed to was not related to an airplane engine, but a smaller turbojet engine. A fragile airline fuselage would have disintegrated before it would have penetrated the various layers of that building (even the so-called entry hole is too small!) Here’s another question: Where are the wings? The thin and easily crushable wings didn’t follow the airplane through the various thick walls, they couldn’t have due to their fragile nature. So, where are they or their debris? No wing collision witness marks on the building’s side, no gashes into the building caused by the wings as they followed their fuselage. So, where are they or their remnants? There did appear to be sooting that may have been caused by the wing’s atomized fuel which was ignited. But, that could be caused by other things too.
To fly an airplane of the size and speed of the airliner, that close to the ground as we’ve asked to believe, would have taken a highly skilled pilot (which was not the case) or exceptional auto-pilot. Further, where are the ground scars the engines would have created in close proximity to the building just before collision? Remember, they do hang lower than the fuselage. Where are the remains of both engines? They certainly wouldn’t have penetrated all of the walls due to their size. There was no visual evidence of penetration or witness marks made as they struck the walls that I recall from the many released photographs.
There’s just not enough evidence that has been publicly presented to support an airline-type airplane colliding with the Pentagon.
No, there’s much more to the 9/11 attack than what we’ve been officially told. Maybe Congressman Ron Paul’s entry into the Federal Register could shed some light onto the matter. Maybe it was about the effort to eliminate the petrodollar’s influence on the world’s economy? Regardless, those folks taking on the issue, such as Morgan and others, need to be a bit more careful about how they present their information because the ‘establishment’ is always watching and wailing to discredit them… the seekers of truth.
SHANKSVILLE , FLIGHT 93 ? WENT SO DEEP , THE PLANE WAS NOT VISIBLE FROM ANYWHERE ? THE NTSB OR WHOM EVER , EXAMINES ACCIDENTS ( NONE WERE LISTED FOR 911 2001 ). FOUND THE BLACK BOXES , ABOUT ? 25 FT. DOWN ? NOW , WHY COULDN’T THEY GO DEEPER AND FIND THE HIJACKERS IN THE PLANE .
PAGE 14 OF THE 911 REPORT STATES , ” THE LAST ATTEMPT TO STOP THE REVOLT , ATAH BUSH , RTURNS THE WHEEL HARD RIGHT, THE PLANE FLIPS ON ITS BACK ( I PRESUME , UPSIDE DOWN) WHY DIDN’T THE PILOT TURN THE WHEEL HARD LEFT ? LET US ASK PHIL ZELIKOW , HOW HE KNEW IT WAS HARD RIGHT ?
THE PASSENGERS ARE STILL ATTACKING THE COCKPIT . ATTAH BUSH AND SALID ZELIKOW , YELL ” ALLAH IS GREAT , TAKE IT DOWN , PULL IT ( WHOOPS ) THAT WAS LARRY THE SILVER STEIN ) . THE UPSIDE PLANE IS NOW PULLED DOWN ?
ONLY A PILOT COULD GIVE US HOW , WHY , ?
TRACON N90 , NEW YORK , LOW FLYING RADAR, THAT IDENTIFIED THE HELICOPTER , SAID THAT WHAT EVER HIT THE TOWERS CAME SO FAST , THEY COULD NOT IDENTIFY THEM .
911 REPORT ; ATC N.Y. DID NOT KNOW FLIGHT 11 HAD CRASHED , WHEN 175 WAS HIJACKED . FIVE MINUTES AFTER 175 PILOT , TOLD THE ATC , ” WE ARE NOT COMING INTO YOUR AREA , ” WE HEARD STRANGE TRANSMISSION EARLIER , SO WE WILL WAIT TO ENTER YOUR ( ZONE ? THEN THEY WERE HIJACKED .
PAGE 8 , 911 REPORT , MAN CALLS HIS DADDY IN CT.; DAD ITS GETTING WORSE HERE , PEOPLE ARE THROWING UP , GETTING SICK , THE PLANE IS FLYING JERKILY ” . BUTT ON FL. 93 , THE PASSENGERS ARE STILL RUNNING , WALKING , CRAWLING TO THE COCK PIT , WHILE PLANE IS UPSIDE DOWN . READ PAGES 13-14 .
NO, no Plane hit the tower .
BEN SLINEY , WORKED AT TRACON N-90 , PRIR TOHIS RETURN TO FAA ; WAS RE-ASSIGNED TO THIS STATION AFTER 911 .( TO DESTROY ANY EVIDENCE ?) NO ONE WAS INTERVIEWED FROM THIS STATION .
A radius from Brookhaven apparently intersects the site where those toasted cars were observed. Is it possible that whatever directed energy used came from that site?
Any opinion on Brookhaven?
Guess I’ll have to look at it. I’m down with shingles and have not been very productive lately, just in pain.
Thanks. Ouch! Shingles are no fun. Look after yourself.
Dr. Morgan: Sorry to hear about your shingles. Hope you’re feeling better by now. I went back to that video just today. I believe the person that posted it assumed that if there were a directed-energy beam coming from east of New York City, it would most likely have
come from the cyclotron at Brookhaven. However, a nearly identical line bisecting the angle made by Church and Vesey Sts. can be extended, running a little north of Brookhaven, out to the end of Long Island. There is a base there that was supposed to have been shut down sometime in the seventies. It’s easy to find on Google maps. The interesting thing is that some people who claim to have been involved in projects on the base made a video tour in 1993. At that time, they kept encountering wiring that had been installed in the eighties and nineties. Also, at the end of the tour, they pass what is supposed to be a maintenance shed for the state park. However, the windows are blacked out and a light pole outside has three transformers and heavy-gauge wire running to the building. A lot of voltage for a maintenance shed. That line from Ground Zero to the base can be connected directly to the big antenna there, which, for what it’s worth, was still pointed roughly in the direction of New York City at the time the Google satellite picture was taken.
THISEXPLAINS WHY TRACON N- 90 ( LOW PLANE RADAR ) IN NEW YORK . ATCS SAID ” WHATEVER CAME WAS SO FAST , WE COULD NOT PICK IT UP ON OUR RADAR.
BEN SLINEY , WORKED OUT OF THIS RADAR SYSTEM BEFORE 911 , AND WENT BACK THERE BEFORE 2004 . HE WAS LISTED IN TRACON N-90 , AS IS PRESENT POSITION AT THE 911 COMMISSION .
IF YOU NEVER HAD SHINGLES , YOU CAN’T SYMPATHIZE WITH THSE AFFLICTED . SO, I JOIN GREAT COMPANY . I WON’T TELL YOU WHERE MINE WAS LOCATED .
Mr. Reynolds, thank you for your dedication and loyalty to the American people.
My question is simple yet two-fold;
1. Was Donald John Trump always predestined/preselected by the shadow government?
2. If he was predetermined to become POTUS, is he a true champion of the American
peoples or not?
It’s understood that your response could be limited or very detailed, both are welcomed.
Thank you ever-so-much for your time and energy.
Regarding who was “in on it.” If you go back and listen to some of the initial people and what they were reporting, some as early as 30 minutes after the first attack, suggesting it was a foreign attack and then as the morning progressed those in on it stepped up their reporting on the attack coming from the middle east, and after the second building was targeted the more those “in on it” almost started reporting it was factual that attack came from the middle east.
DIANE SAWYER , AND CHUCK GIBSON , LOOKED , BEHAVED VERY STRANGELY , WHEN THEY TOOK OVER THE BROADCASTING OF 911 , DAN DAHLER WAS “FORCED TO TRY TO CONVINCE PETER JENNINGS , THAT IT WAS A PLANE , NOT A MISSILE , AS HE PREVIOUSLY TOLD SAWYER . GIBSON SNUCK OUT OF THE BROADCAST , OBVIOUSLY KNOWING WHAT WAS HAPPENING .
While such preselection probably has occurred, why would the shadow government select “the Donald”? Or stay with such a pick as his campaign unfolded? He is a champion of the American people in his own, unique, and contradictory way. The neglected fly-over-country, predominantly white voters certainly identified with his message and style. Hence the Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin results which cooked Hillary’s goose. The Dems have abandoned the white working class for identity politics (alleged victim classes) to their detriment. The party is in danger of disappearance as the major opponent of the R’s.
Mr. Jack Bonner , thank you . i just visited that VIMEO site ,;fantastic and Ms. Judy Woods is there also . A home run ; grand slam .
Please explain all the plane debris from each crash site. Also please explain how 104 people claim to have saw a plane hit the Pentagon.
There were people from the convenience store/gas station who said they saw underneath the plane that flew over their area something attached to the plane. It was reported that something was released and what ever it was crashed into the side of the building and the plane itself pulled up and flew off over the building and then was obscured by the fire and smoke. The footage that was posted shows that what ever hit the building was not the plane they said it was. Also the military has a history of delivering bombs and supplies etc. in war zones that contain what is needed in those areas in a similar fashion, this could be an explanation of how some of the debris got into the area. The engines they found alone depicts a much smaller aircraft impacted the building. Holographic images also could explain why people claim to have seen what they thought they did. (I use the example of the Billboard Awards where Michael Jackson who is dead was used in a dance routine, check it out and see how realistic they make this medium look.)
THESE ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN GOING ON FOR SO LONG , IT MAKES NO SENSE TO KEEP REJECTING THE NAYSAYERS ; LET THEM PROVIDE PROOF .
THE FAA ” NEVER ” CONTACTED NEADS / NORAD ; USED INTER CHANGABLE LIKE THE 911 STAFF POINTED OUT ” COMMAND CENTER ” WAS “USED ” BY ZELIKOW .
IF YOU COMPARE THE 911 REPORT WITH THE 911 COMMISSION HEARINGS ( EARINGS ) YOU WILL SOON NOTICE THE HEARINGS ARE NOT IN THE REPORT . ONE DAY , JUNE 17, 2004 ;THE LAST HEARING , THE 12TH ; WAS 5+ HOURS LONG . ZELIKOW TOOK UP ONE+ HOUR WITH OPENING STATEMENT ; THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT AGENCIES ON 911 . WHY WAIT TILL THE LAST MEETING TO ????? 8 WITNESSES ; 4 DOD , 4 FAA .
THE FBI TOOK UP ALL DAY , ON JUNE 16 , MAKING UP STORIES ABOUT EVERYTHING , ESPECIALLY WORKING AROUND :” JOHN O’ NEILL . < KILLED ON 911 IN THE WTC ; WHERE HIS FRIENDS CONVENIENTLY SET HIM UP . MARY JO WHITE , JEROME HAUER , FRAN TOWNSEND ( who ran right into Camp David with Bush to celebrate the event ) .SILVERSTEIN WAS INSTRUMENTAL SETTING UP THE JOB . RUDY G & PATAKI BEING THEIR PUPPETEERS ,
hi reynold, I’ve just a question… where passengers of the 9/11 “flights” are over?
Nobody has ever pointed out the evidence that I have. It is the greatest evidence of what he describes later in his video……Look at 1:23:51/2 at https://vimeo.com/115801417. You will shit your pants…….Check out the bright light that comes down to the eventual collision…..How good is that folks…….
DEAR DR. REYNOLDS ( MORGAN )As i speak , i am developing a complete scenario whereas the entire FAA Administration , like GWB ‘s Admin . were in on the fun ?. Why do i say “FUN “. Seriously , your hearts will pour out to all victims , families and friends , ten times more , if and when i can get this out .
Four of the top Executives @FAA , went to work for METRON AVIATION . JACK KIES , hired BEN SLINEY the guy who brought all the planes down on 911 .( i even saw him waving the sticks guiding them in .At first i thought it was GWB landing on the carrier .) Seriously , MONTE BELGER ,who lied to the 911 Commission ( with their complicity ) ,succeeded Jack Kies has President aft Metron . Jane Garvey and Bem Sliney became Directors around 2010.
BELGER was appointed to the Deputy Director position by Law from Congress in 1999 ; Same time has Metron is setting up a new system (FSM) . This and the CDM from another company was tested by 2 Scientist from Kansas State U. in 2000 .
Now , backtrack to 1987 ,Ronald Reagan named Allan Macartor to the position of FAA Administrator . GHWB keeps him in place 1989 . Allan becomes CEO of Airbus ,France .
Airbus acquires METRON , 2011 . METRON was established in 1995 , and working for the FAA .
KIes and Belger brought 1.7 Billion dollars of Government contracts with them .
Everyone in the FAA was either promoted or found employ in Private companies . (Except John White and Jeff Griffeths , both of whom were forced to testify with Belger and Sliney .Answering questions only when prodded by Belger , Sliney , or the Commission.
I have sufficient information about their interviews by the 911 Commission staff . 99% corrupt and conflicted according to 911 Commissioner , Lehman SEC . 0f the Navy under Reagan ?
1998 /99 was the year of the PNAC ( NWO ) with Harvard Scholars , Phil Zelikow 911 Commission Staff and Secretary of Defense , Ashton Carter and here is what they expected in 2016 Jeb Bush , president .
The Commission ( 1 ) and Staff (2) , and witness (1) also , an investigator of sorts .
Jamie Gorelick , WILMER HALE dorr ***cutler ***( She signed on to WH while still a Commissioner , conflict of interest ,Treason ) Staff Dana Hyde , Steven Dunne , Right hand man to CHIEF COUNSEL of the Commission , Dan Marcus . Witness , hahaha , Robert FBI Mueller > 5 lawyers from the same firm . Fair ? or Unfair ?
Fred Fielding , Commissioner , was Presidential Counsel , succeeding Lloyd Cutler , Senior member of WHDCP . Harriet Miers , succeeding Fielding .
Miers is in deep Muck with GWB . Texas Government and TANG destructor of Shrubs military career . with Karen Hughes , Gonzales . & others .
Dear Joseph and Morgan, How gracious you are: Morgan for allowing the usage of you website and Joseph for the time you have given me in conveying the information you have shared. Thank You. With time ticking away and the world changing so fast and more and more people are being affected (actually infected by) these changes, I will have to hope for the opening of many peoples eyes to bring about any calling for an out cry for justice. Not just for the lives that were sacrificed on 9/11 but for all of our service personnel who have been sacrificed in the fake war that Bush and like minded officials orchestrated. I ask for forgiveness for them and at the same time their accountability to this nation and its people and hope that they on their own will examine their actions and admit what they have done and ask for forgiveness and let what ever justice come their way, come.
I firmly believe all the evil actions so quickly coming upon this world have been planned for many years. They have been disguised under the color of white. (White House, and the White Garments of one soon to visit this nation ).They are being allowed to pit people against people so the evil of this earth can bring about their new world order. Though many would like to know right now all the truth behind 9/11 and many other unfortunate incidents not only of this nation but of this world, I’m sure it is not forth coming unless those who have been apart of the actual planning of all these occurrences find their conscience, step up to the mic telling the truth that will set them and us free. Until this begins I urge all the world to find what ever good we can in one another, (loving our neighbor as ourselves) refuse to be sucked into agreeing with evil and or committing evil, using the examples of Morgan and you like sharing information or a website so communications will stay open so those who are seeking truth have the opportunity to do so. May you both be protected in your efforts to bring about truth, justice, and in the end forgiveness which will be man’s peace. Have a great day! Adino
Listen to the one with the White Garment ( of Silver and Gold ) , Public Relations man . That’s all he is after Ratzinger ,Benedict ,Neal Bush ; The former , X-pope had his house renovated before he moved back in .
Recently they treated all homeless people in the City of Vat i can , a shower , haircut , and good clothing . How kind is that . The homeless are all the Cardinals stationed in the VAT I can , coming here to,tell the masses “Equality to all “. And to all , “Spread the wealth “.
Inclusive society he told all the people ,in his last visit to a poor , South American Country . Goes around yelling , one sentence ” feel good ” to be posted on the front page . Never leaves anything behind , like Bush , ” No Child left behind , and absolutely no money for them either :> .
Adino says: Mr. Reynolds – Thank You. I’ve said no planes at 9/11. I have finally found someone who really can see. With out getting into a lot of information that has been brought out, I want to ask you what you think about this.
I believe people saw planes, and heard plane noises, but I think they were holographic images. I believe building number 7 was the control center in projecting the images with the help of satellites the war games that were coincidentally being conducted at the same time, and explosives that were detonated at the time the image hit the the towers.
This is not hard to do if you have the right equipment. Did you see the Billboard Awards with Michael Jackson after he was dead? Or Celine Dion sing with Elvis? Movies galore use this tech.
H.A.R.R.P I might venture to say also might have had their hand in this situation. I believe these are a few explanations that aid the fact why there were no planes, yet people will swear that they saw one. Building 7 had to be destroyed because of the equipment and technology that was housed in that building. This technology has been around since 1897 when Nicola Tesla discovered it. I feel it was effectively used in the Lourdes appearances and as time has allowed progress in tech., our government used it against its own people and I can almost guarantee it will be used again. If the people would stopping allowing fear to direct them we could have held the individuals responsible for 9/11 and many more situations, accountable. I would like to hear what you think since I have said from the get go “There were no planes.” Adino
You can find real history of 911 on the internet : simply look up , 911 , police helicopters all over , and around the buildings ; when NY ATC calls around to see if anyone is seeing any planes flying around ,that shouldn’t be where they are . Suddenly NJ .ATC , low altitude ( NY is high altitude ) says , what’s that down by the river /. ” Oh , i see another one coming in low “, There is goes right into the Tower . ” Happy horse shit .
Now , Tracon -N-90 , low radar says “whatever was coming in , it was so fast , we had no time to react . ” If i find the source , i will re-post .
Benedict Sliney , NOM on 911, ( National Operations Manager ) transferred to N-90 when he left Herndon , and had worked there prior , as a supervisor . Probably went back to destroy the Helicopter bit that was reported , having crashed into the building , .
Pardon my Frtench , but Shakespeare did not teach in my hometown of Woonsocket ,R.I .
Dear Joseph P Bell, Thank you for sharing your information. I have viewed many of the 9/11 videos
and I have to agree with Morgan; “No Planes.” I have flown planes and I know how sensitive the wings are, so even if the plane entered the building at the noted speed, the wings and engines would have been dislodged from the plane on impact. More than likely the plane would have crumbled up on hitting the inside steel beams and concrete. Seats and luggage and bodies would have been sent flying in all different directions. The tail probably would have become dislodged from the body of the plane and some sign of it would have fallen to the ground.
Since you did share with me your information I will take a look at your suggestion again and see if I missed anything. I do work with photoshop and some other computer programs that can generate the effects of what we see on the 9/11 tapes. Thanks again for your input. I can get around in some of these computer programs but for the most part I’m not to savvy on the computer. I don’t know how to twitter or blog etc. I’m lucky to get around in my email. I wanted to see what Morgan had to say but I don’t know if I have connected with his site in the correct way. I was surprised to receive your comment but I enjoy the communications. I might have more to share after I look at this 9/11 video that you say is new. Be well and hope you are having a great day. Adino
Dear Adino : Thank you for the kind words .i have never before been flattered like that .
Here is another way to find ” NO PLANES “; OR JUST pointing out ,the planes are listed on 9-10-2001 , (with all necessary details ) whilst the planes on 9-11 2001 ,( the same planes ) do not have the required information . Enough here to begin an investigation into the crimes of the 911 Commission .
Go to NTSB Statistics , you can list any plane , from any airport , find the corresponding take off time ; 9-10 , will be on target , but 9-11 does not have take off times , for the same 5 planes .
( Dr. Reynolds pointed out , they could have returned the same day ,and ready to fly the next day ?)
That remains a probability ? Flights 11, 175 , 77 , 93 , 1989 , were all involved .
1989 is such a strange happening ; it landed in Cleveland . It was mistaken for Flight 93 .
All the passengers were sent into a building ? and never seen again ? The staff from that plane were told to take off any identifying tags ,ties , etc. and go out the Terminal . Now , you can’t make this up .
If you look up Flight 93 , and the Great Lakes , 93 was flying below an NSA Research plane . They called ATC , told them the plane below them was too close . .They did not know it was 93 until they landed . WHO KNEW and what kept them from saying something .The Commissioners did not go anywhere with this information . Buried by Zelikow .
That alone should have been reason to reopen ( put all the commissioners , staff , and many witnesses the definition of witness , does not apply to 90 % of those who went before the Commission ,
So many of them lied : To find a most interesting thing ?, Tom Kean’s , Without Precedent , only mentions Monte Belger , as a witness for the FAA . All 300 lbs of him , lied . He wouldn’t even make a great rug .
He told the commission he was in his office and in charge that morning . (Three places to find his lies ; Shirley Miller , his Secretary , told Staff she had to run from the Operations Floor , and tell him a plane had been hijacked . When they got back to the ( WOC ) Washington Operations Center ,the first place had crashed and 175 was now hijacked . Another cute story .( 911 Report , p. 22 ? ) .
175 tells ( since when ) the NY ATC , they are not going into their “space ” , because of the chatter on their radios ? or whatever . Five minutes later they are Hijacked . What the @#$%. )
HISTORY COMMONS , POSTED his story .
Belger’s written statement contradicts his opening statement . The statement taken by 911 Staff , contradicts his statement on JUNE 17 , 2004 .
OVER 20 LAWYERS ON THE COMMISSION and their staff ; No one picks up on all the Conflicts .
The Staff should be investigated separately ;
There is so much more . i will leave it for now . Thank you , Dr. Reynolds and Adino Janda
another development that i missed . Mark Elsis , 911 Web site : F-15 flying past WTC . too fast for me to stop . ( view F-15 @ WTC , video )
Here is an example of how the brilliant, intelligent , ( I.Q.175 ) Zelikow ,wrote the 911Report . ( we have to look at the simple things in life) plenty of dummies out there , like the911 Commission and staff , and witnesses.
Flight 175 ; page 8 of the Report . Passenger ? calls his father in Connecticut .”Dad, its getting real bad here , plane is flying (eroctic ) erratically , passengers are getting sick , throwing up all over . don’t worry Dad , they are going to crash the p[lane into a building .It will be over real quick . Oh, my God , my God .
Dad says ; Tell them about Flight 93 , The pilot is flipping the wings side to side trying to throw the ones who are carving the cock-pit . Some people had hung up their phones to join the revolt . The pilot sees he is having no luck ; he flips the nose of the plane up and down . ( What a pilot , a jumbo jet would break up in the sky ,) . Tod Beamer yells , lets roll ?
Not in the book , but it was all over the news . The bravest man i9n the world , stooped ?
the plane from hitting the White House . How did these passengers stay on their feet , when turbulence causes disruptions ?
Now the pilot and co-pilot are frantic , they are getting close to the cockpit ; WHAT TO DO ? Is it time to take it down ” ? Pilot says , they are getting too close , he turns the wheel hard to the right ? uh , why not left > the passengers are still coming , the plane is on its back ( upside down ) they can hear the shouting and breaking of glass ?
The comparison between all 4 flights , proves the joke is on us . HOW DID ZELIKOW KNOW WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO SUCH A DEGREE .?
OH , YES , FLIGHT 11 ; THE TRANSMISSION TO THE ATC , WAS NOT HEARD BY BETTY ONG ; SHE IS ON THE PHONE WITH NYDIA GONZALES FOR 26 MINUTES , AT A, AIRLINES ( i cannot say , american ) and DAN LEWIN IS STABBED FROM BEHIND , AS HE TRIES TO INTERVENE , ( JEWISH MILITARY ) how convenient > He did not know another hijacker was sitting behind him . OH , SHIT .
JUST THE FACTS , MAM
IF YOU SHOW PICTURES FROM NEW YORK , IT IS NOT THE SAME AS ON TELEVISION , ( STILL PHOTOS ) ALSO , THE HELICOPTER ( WHITE ) PASSED BY DIANE SAWYERS , AND SHE DID NOT ACKNOWLEDGE IT , BUT MR. BROWN ? ON ANOTHER STATION DID ; HE EXPLAINED IT WAS ??????? LIKE THEIR ANTENNA TO THE SCENE PROBABLY SHOWING THE TV. STATIONS THE PHONY ACTION WE ALL SAW.
Whilst watching a You Tube presentation of yours ridiculing the Official Conspiracy Theory regarding the Cold Blooded Manhattan Massacre of September 11th 2001 you stated that you did not fully understand the Physics and Maths regarding the fairy tale story of a Boeing 767 series 200 being able to fly or stay in one piece at 580mph at sea level.
The two links below contain all or if not most of what One is required to know regarding such ridiculous claims within the comments section, written by yours truly.
Regards and thanks.
PS, Are you on Twitter? There is some valid ‘action’ on Twitter if One fishes around.
Here is a question for Dr. Reynolds or anyone else who might have an answer. What the heck has happened to the 9/11 truther movement, especially in the past few years? Myopic views dominate the movement, now fractured in a dizzying array of theories, all at odds with one another. What’s been said about a “house divided?” Is there no consensus of opinion, like … ah … a new investigation?” Has this turned into something like a bunch of kids on a playground choosing sides, bickering and berating one another? Are we still being played?
TOO MUCH INFORMATION COMING IN , NO ONE HAS TIME TO CONCENTRATE ON FINDING EVIDENCE , OR REAL SOURCES .
THEY ARE DISTRACTED BY THEIR OWN ” TOPICS ” , THE LACK OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT , AND THEIR LIES .
I KNOW SOME WHO HAVE WRITTEN X AMOUNT OF BOOKS , HAVE A BLOG WHERE THE KEEPER OF THE BLOG EDITS THE BOOKS , AND WRITING THEIR OWN BOOKS . CONCENTRATE ON THE FAA ; BEN SLINEY , MONTE BELGER , JANE GARVEY ,AND THE BOSS JACK KIES . METRON AVIATION , AIRBUS CEO ALAN MACARTOR .( FAA Administartor under Reagan & Bush , 1987-1989 .) It is all in the back ground . NORAD tapes ; Nasypany ( excluded from Commission Hearings , along with WINFIELD , NMCC . Captain Leidig , NMCC .
IF YOU REALLY WANT TO DO AN HISTORICAL EPORT ? CHECK A ” COUP D’ETAT ;
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE , LYNNE CHENEY , AND PNAC , ASHTON CARTER , PHIL ZELIKOW , JOHN DEUTCH , CIA ; JAMIE GORELICK , 911 COMMISSIONER , AND OWNER OF WILMER HALE ( DORR CUTLER ) .
HARVARD U. , JFK SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT , LAURENCE TRIBE ,H.U. , CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER , AND THE SILENCE OF THE SUPREMES .
STATR WITH 2000 ELECTION .; 1999 BUSH VIOLATED THE ” FREE SPEECH ACT “,
” I WILL ATTACK IRAQ IF ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 2000 “.
GROUNDS FOR IMPEACHMENT .
Find the video with Diane Sawyer and Chuck Gibbons ; Before Peter Jenning’s came on . 19 minutes into the start of their morning show , if you want to see something strange . ( watch for the Camcorder fly by ) they don’t seem to see it . In the Jennings section , they pulled WTC # 7 , off the air . Jenning’s also mentioned the AWACS flying over D.C. Johjn King and others commented on this .
CNN , Aaron Brown commented on it , when he saw it . Was CNN feeding everyone else . Brown stood with his back to the WTC all the time . Looking very nervous ?
Of course , they were all in on it . Check the promotions after 911 .
The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued byMorgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York. What is happening or has happened with this?
This video shows fuselage wreckage.
However, I believe these planes and it’s hijackers were designed as a marketing campaign for a deeper more sinister reason.
Thermite to cut the column theory makes sense.
Why the 5 other buildings looked like a basic demolition which would have been pre planned.
Why America changed it’s foreign policy on terrorism to invade Afghanstan soon after.
Why poor ol’ Osama was blamed again- guess he makes the perfect villain.
And why they had about 20 full names and photos of who apparently hijacked the planes within a cpl of hours after the plane crashes?
And why does more than 60% of American now believe their own government had a hand in these attacks/nursery of their own people.
No video I have seen..including the CNN Concoction above can hold an explanation candle to the videos of the Twin Towers, as they disassociated, effervesced at a central reaction point and cascaded upwards, outwards and downwards in disassociating dust. That record is extant….Anybody who disputes the general thrust of Dr Woods work and Reynolds work here….Should do their damn hardest to explain that visual phenomena???
That of course is impossible for them so they are confined to, bombs, planes, thermite, quantity of debris et al…..All irrelevant, all bullshit in light of that video of disassociating matter. ISNT THAT RIGHT SHILLS AND DILLS?
Does Morgan have an email address?
Hi Dr Reynolds.
I would like to believe your theories, but I keep finding a fundamental flaw on them.
You keep saying that the aluminum plane hits a block of steel and concrete, but in reality, due to the windows on the buildings, you could say that roughly 50% of said “block” is actually “nothing” (glass) and therefore, the plain could split (since aluminium is soft) in “thin” slices that pass through the “face” of the building with close to none resistance (so, almost no deceleration, full penetration and all the things that you point as proof of “no plane”).
Also, the way the buildings were built, the actual steel frame was covered with a layer of insulation and the white/grey decoration and windows.
On the images of the “plane-shaped” damage on the “face” of the building, you can see that “most” of it, is damage of that “decoration” layer and that the steel frames are, indeed, standing still as expected.
Finally, I would like to ask you, how it is possible that the broken steel that is shown on the images, is slightly bent toward the inside of the building. If a bomb on the inside were to be the reason for the damage, the steel would bend to the outside.
Dear DR.Morgan ; I have just uncovered an article featuring Jane Garvey , former head of the FAA . On the 10th Anniversary of 911 , she told http://www.masslive.com/…/09/911_10th_annivesary_former_he.html If that doesn’t work , put in (Garvey 10th anniversary 911 ).that she “, made the decision to halt air traffic across the country ,;Boston and New York had already done so . It was the right thing to do .
On June 17 , 2004 , the 12th meeting of the 911 Commission ,FAA witness Ben Sliney and Monte Belger ( Garvey’s Deputy Director ) told the commissioners that ,HE , Sliney , on his first day on duty , took it upon himself to land all the planes .
There have been quite a few discussions re: who really landed the planes ?
In one case ,Belger told reporters that Mineta ordered the shut down .
These comments alone should be cause to re-open 911 .
Belger was testifying before the commission and told them “he was in charge on 911 & in his office “. His Secretary ,Shirley Miller told 911 Staff , that she went to find Monte , after the first hi=jacked plane occurred. He had been getting coffee . By the time they returned to the Operations Center , the second plane had been hijacked . He immediately called Mrs. Garvey , who was with Mineta’s office at the time . ?
Also , does anyone have information on the C130 H -ANG Cargo plane ,that was leisurely flying around ?
morgan…..I have been trying to gain some info on the size of a typayical 757 cockpit, so I can put
into perspective how the “hijackers” over powered the pilots. the height, room between seats,
ally way, thickness of the door etc…..
Since the 911 Commission , had no intention of finding anyone guilty; They began every meeting , or during the meeting with , ” we are not here to place the blame on anyone , NOR to shame anyone . ” Dr. Reynolds and John Farmer ,” The Ground Truth ” , have had the same attitude .
If you care to research COHEN GROUP ,and the number of derelicts that he and Christine , (governor of New Joisey)Whitman ; Look at her first name ,CHRIST < whooo that is really sad .
Channel 7 ,Diane Sawyer and ????? , her partner ? who became the Anchor on the 6:30pm news , until Sawyer replaced him . I will try to post the URL ; During the original Flight 11 and 175 ; ( morning show ? was interrupted ) These two put on the worst demonstration of two highly skilled newscasters ever seen on the air . You have to watch their movements and their expressions .
Until Peter Jennings finally came on ; the segment where Building 7 came down was extracted from the sequence .Un be knownst ? to Jennings . He also mentions the AWACS : Cheney did the same on the Russert show . The entire 911 hinges on the people ,not the falling buildings ,not the bombs , not the planes . What is left out of the 911 Hearings ( never published ) and the Report does not mention any witnesses , except who was to appear ,at the end of the book .
What is the protocol for a pilot if a high jacker maintains he has the rest of the plane held
Hostage or claims he has a bomb?
Morgan, is this true?: “The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.” Source: neonnettle[DOT]com
Morgan, is this true?…”The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.” Source: http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that-no-planes-hit-the-twin-towers#.UxXRUAhgiZQ.facebook
RE” : Planes in plain sight ? One video of a” plane” (on a clear sunny sky ) does not = No plane parts at Shanksville ( actually near Camp David as reported on TV with FBI reporting ) and the Pentagon .
The 911 Report on the Pentagon is less than 3 pages , containing 1 picture , less than 1000 words, ; it was pointed out by the writer (Zelikow) that tthis was so Insignificant of an event compared to WTC , where thousands were killed and so many injured , . If it was a single incident on 911 , the report would be the focus .
The words and quotes may not be exact , it can be read on line in the 911commissionhearings.com .
The plane ? in NY was very dark , no windows to my knowledge , ;funny looking according to some witnesses . It certainly did not look to me as a Passenger Jet .
yea, uh, you claim no planes were used during the attack on 9/11…you also claim the media and our govt doctored videos…how do you account for EVERY video showing clearly a plane hitting the 2nd tower? do you claim they are ALL fake? and if so. are you clinically insane?
Kartal552013 : try 12+ years of this (HIS ) crap and more with Poppy . No one seems to understand that they are the biggest Drug dealers in the world . Reagan and Nancy were sniffing and saying “,Just say no “. hahahaha Like the entire bush family are the real Terrorists ; beginning with Presscott DE Bush (his mother exposed his lies to the press , and they chased him out of town . he goes on to be friends with all the Nazi supporters .
He was in WW1 and lied about saving his General ,by diverting a bomb with his bayonnet ,or a sword / With lies like that ,and the Organizations VFW, american legion , leading his charges .
Knights of Columbus and Malta , and many other Katholic groups are backing the bushes .
I just LOVE how the supposed engine manages to land nicely upright, UNDERNEATH!! the scaffolding…with the “Murry” street sign neatly (and so SO conviently) lying right beside it so there’s no possibility of mistaking where it supposedly “Landed”. hehe And if you believe THAT fairy tale…I have some of Saddam’s “Nookular” weapons to sell ya! LOLNICE TRY, PsyOps boyz!