History Channel Covers Up Pearl Harbor

by
Morgan Reynolds
December 7, 2016

This year marks the 75th anniversary of the December 7, 1941, Japanese “surprise” attack on Pearl Harbor, killing 2,403 Americans and wounding 1,178. Central Arkansas is staging a week-long series of events to commemorate “a date that will live in infamy” that propelled U.S. entry into World War II, allegedly our last “good” war. And that war thrust Franklin D. Roosevelt to “greatness.” Exhibits and tours are supposed to provide learning experiences for young people.

fdr_pearl_harborBut will such events teach children or us (older children) the truth about the 75-minute attack on Pearl Harbor? Nope, improbable in the extreme. The facts are too disturbing, even at this late date. Their exposure would wreck the folklore about an unprovoked attack by “the empire of Japan” on a peace-loving, innocent USA. Yet indisputable facts from the U.S. government itself prove beyond reasonable doubt that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and top advisors like George C. Marshall and Naval bosses like Frank Knox and Harold R. Stark arranged the successful Japanese attack at Pearl.

That’s right, FDR and his advisors arranged it and knew exactly when it would happen. The President and his co-conspirators kept vital intelligence from Naval Commander Husband E. Kimmel and Army Commander Walter Short at Pearl so that loss of life and ships would be huge, no mere pin-prick like Fort Sumter or even the Churchill-arranged German sinking of the British war ship Lusitania in 1915 which cost 128 American lives. Bigger loss of life equals bigger casus belli.

800px-a6m2_on_carrier_akagi_1941How do I know FDR did it? While there are many books proving Roosevelt’s perfidy, 17 years of dogged research by Robert B. Stinnett gave us his magnificent Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor (2001) plus we have John V. Denson’s masterful 73-page essay, “Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the First Shot: A Study in Deceit and Deception” in his edited volume, Reassessing the Presidency (2001).Consider some key facts about how the set up worked:

  • Years of U.S. study andexercises beginning in 1932 prove Pearl Harbor extremely vulnerable to surprise aircraft carrier attack. Japan patterns its attack on these results.
  • At Roosevelt’s request, Lt. Commander Arthur H. McCollum—Office of Naval Intelligence and an expert on Japan—submits a secret eight-step plan on October 7, 1940, designed to provoke the Japanese into firing the first shot (Stinnett Appendix A, Denson p. 499).
  • An expert on the navy, Roosevelt (assistant secretary of the navy 1913-20) puts all eight steps into play.
  • Roosevelt fires fleet commander James O. Richardson, the top authority on Pacific naval warfare and Japanese strategy, February 1, 1941, for his opposition to FDR’s “illogical basing of the fleet at Hawaii.”
  • In accord with the plan American warships are deployed in Japanese territorial waters to provoke the Japanese into firing the first shot. The same “bait” tactics were used in the Atlantic to get the Germans to fire the first shot.3civilianscar
  • Seizure of all Japanese assets in the U.S. occurs July 1941, effectively terminating trade between the countries.
  • Identical orders from the British and Dutch effectively cut off all oil from Japan, leaving it one year’s supply in reserve and no peaceful prospects for new supplies.
  • By October, 1940, U.S. cryptographers break the Japanese military codes yet all crucial messages are denied Kimmel and Short at Pearl. In effect, Washington knew everything, Pearl nothing.
  • Roosevelt refuses to meet with a desperate, peace-seeking Konoe government, leading to its collapse in Tokyo in October, 1941, succeeded by militaristic Tojo.
  • The “Vacant Sea” policy goes into effect on November 25, 1941, emptying the north Pacific of all traffic as Admiral Yamamoto’s fleet of 31 surface ships (including six heavy aircraft carriers), 408 aircraft and 35 submarines departs Hitokappu Bay in the Kurile Islands, steaming 12 unmolested days toward the attack point 275 miles north of Pearl.

On Sunday night December 4, 2016, I watched the History Channel’s presentation of “Pearl Harbor: The Truth.” History is owned by A&E networks, a joint venture between Hearst Corporation and the Disney-ABC television group of the Walt Disney Company. So what could we expect, it’s corporate media, right? Slickly packaged lies.

True but I also knew in advance that the show was to go awry because it was based on a new book by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan, A Matter of Honor: Pearl Harbor: Betrayal, Blame and a Family’s Quest for Justice. I have not read the book but from the back cover we learn: “…through sheer inefficiency—the top brass in Washington had failed to provide Kimmel with vital intelligence…They [authors]…clear President Franklin D. Roosevelt of the charge that he knew the attack was coming.”pearl-harbor_0 Pardon my puke!

While it has some worthwhile things to learn, the show whitewashes the Pearl Harbor set-up as “blunders” and claims FDR was in the dark about the whole deal. Historian Craig Symonds says toward the start, “Washington knew everything.” Agreed. And Roosevelt did not know anything!? You cannot be serious (scholar/researchers!). Talk about naiveté in service of the regime. Washington does not work that way.

The History show mentions none of the facts I list above. None, zero, nada. Ignoring such critical facts makes it a lot easier to keep the Roosevelt legend about Pearl Harbor alive, now doesn’t it?

The History show notes the connection between 9/11 and Pearl Harbor because both were attacks on American soil with similar losses life. My agreement with that idea goes much further: similarities include the “unthinkable” idea that “Bushians” arranged 9/11 as the Rooseveltians did Pearl Harbor.

History also points out that all presidents since Roosevelt refuse to endorse the Congressional attempt to repeal the scapegoating of Kimmel and Short. Why? Maybe because any such move would lead to official confirmation of Roosevelt’s treason and far more.

Roosevelt, ironically chief planner of the attack, appointed his “Roberts Commission” chaired by Associate Supreme Court Justice Owen J. Roberts to investigate the facts (sure) about the Pearl Harbor attack, the first of 10 investigations. Only seven weeks later (!) the Commission reported its findings to Congress, accusing Admiral Kimmel and General Short of “errors of judgment” and “dereliction of duty.” It only takes seven weeks to conclude an “investigation” in a town where the result is predetermined. Admiral James O. Richardson, the previous Pacific fleet commander whom FDR fired, commented,
“It is the most unfair, unjust and deceptively dishonest document ever printed by the Government Printing Office.  I cannot conceive of honorable men serving on the commission without greatest regret and deepest feeling of shame.”

uss_arizona_memorialAdmiral William Harrison Standley, a member of the five-man Commission, later disavowed the report, calling Roberts’ handling of the investigation “as crooked as a snake,” and maintaining that “these two officers were martyred” and “if they had been brought to trial, both would have been cleared of the charge.” General Short had petitioned a court martial but was denied. In 1944 courtesy of a Congressional mandate, court martials for Kimmel and Short began. The Army Pearl Harbor Board concluded its report about Walter Short’s trial with: “Up to the morning of December 7, 1941, everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States except [Tokyo’s final diplomatic message] the very hour and minute when bombs were falling on Pearl Harbor.” Criticism of the President was forbidden as beyond its jurisdiction. Both Pearl commanders were found innocent but the reports were suppressed and more cover-up “investigations” conducted to overturn the results!

Following a 52-47 Senate vote in 1999 exonerating Kimmel and Short, Senator William V. Roth Jr. (R-DE) said, “They were denied vital intelligence that was available in Washington,” adding that they had been made scapegoats by the Pentagon. Senator Strom Thurmond (R-SC) termed Kimmel and Short “the two final victims of Pearl Harbor.”

More important than the injustice to Kimmel and Short is traitors from Roosevelt on down getting away with their crimes. Remember Pearl Harbor—by all means—but for what it really was. There is a long, lamentable history of fraudulent pretexts for war by evil politicians around the world. The United States is no exception.

This entry was posted in 911. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to History Channel Covers Up Pearl Harbor

  1. History is written by the victors…

    “My history, therefore, describes the inspiring struggle of those who have fought slavery and racism (Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, Fannie Lou Hamer, Bob Moses), of the labor organizers who have led strikes for the rights of working people (Big Bill Haywood, Mother Jones, César Chávez), of the socialists and others who have protested war and militarism (Eugene Debs, Helen Keller, the Rev. Daniel Berrigan, Cindy Sheehan). My hero is not Theodore Roosevelt, who loved war and congratulated a general after a massacre of Filipino villagers at the turn of the century, but Mark Twain, who denounced the massacre and satirized imperialism.”

  2. dachsielady says:

    “Bushians” arranged 9/11 as the Rooseveltians did Pearl Harbor.
    Please name the entity that rules both the Bushians and the Rooseveltians.

    ““…through sheer inefficiency—the top brass in Washington had failed”

    Pearl Harbor and 9-11 were most efficient successful operations.

    • I cannot say I have enough evidence to ID an entity that rules both Bushians and Rooseveltians. Do you? A clearly demarcated, continuous entity may not exist but John V. Denson makes a compelling case that through both public and secret participation of the “powerful Anglo-American Establishment, America was dragged into these European wars [WWI and WWII] against the wishes of the vast majority of American citizens” (p. 456). The City of London comes to mind. Certainly FDR and Churchill were buddy-buddy conspirators with clever use of separate private and public positions, a` la Hillary Clinton. Then we have the Bush crime family with its long history–globalist, secretive, liars, pro-war, crony capitalists, energy, etc. Russ Baker in his Family of Secrets (2009) book writes that Poppy Bush “epitomizes the intersection of oil, finance, and sub rosa intelligence that has been a shadow force in our country for the last half century and more.” Poppy’s daddy Prescott was senior partner at the “preeminent British-American investment bank Brown Brothers Harriman (p. 16)…The Brown Brothers Harriman group was to a person rabidly Anglophilic. Indeed, the Bushes have long touted their distant familial ties to the House of Windsor” (p. 17). There’s much more in Baker’s book about the many Bush family connections to Wall Street, Scotland, London, BP and oil, Tony Blair and the like. Seems like a good start on an Anglo-American Establishment hypothesis for Bushians and Rooseveltians. A new book by Sean Stone (son of Oliver Stone), New World Order looks promising as a development of this thesis. We’ll see.

      • dachsielady says:

        “I cannot say I have enough evidence to ID an entity that rules both Bushians and Rooseveltians. Do you? A clearly demarcated, continuous entity may not exist…”

        I do not doubt that there is one entity that rules both, but by its nature, it will never be “a clearly demarcated, continuous entity” and we will never have “enough evidence.”

        I refer to it as “the cryptocracy..”

        See:
        Operation Mind Control – The PARANOIA Edition
        https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1329831284
        Walter Bowart – 2016 – ‎History

        The international central banks seem to be a constant in studying the characteristics of the cryptocracy.

        It is very important to point out what we know about the one-entity theory, in order to come to true history.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s