Thanks to JH for all his help.
[If a video below does not play properly, refresh the page and that should correct the problem. When playing videos, use the controls in the lower right corner to enlarge, adjust playback speed and enhance resolution.]
Alice laughed: “There’s no use trying,” she said, “one can’t believe impossible things.”
“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.”—David Hume
There are a number of conspiracy theories about 9/11. No surprise there. This is par for the course following any major event, especially when the event does not pass the sniff test and the government/media complex is not forthcoming at all. And the government’s 9/11 tall tale suffers fatal credibility problems.1
The U.S. government started its holy war(s) based on an official conspiracy theory about 19 Muslims hijacking, expertly flying and suicidally crashing four sophisticated Boeing airliners in a most impressive, coordinated display on the morning of 9/11, committing mass murder. Oh, really? That’s the narrative. Four for four, yet no Boeing 767 or 757 had been hijacked in domestic service since their introduction in 1982. And only two had been hijacked overseas, both Ethiopian Airlines flights, with the tragic loss in 1996 of 125 passengers and crew (including the hijackers) out of 175 aboard, off the Comoros islands on the east coast of Africa. And hijackings often fail.2
Despite initial promises to the contrary, U.S. officials Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice never offered any evidence, a so-called white paper, to validate the government narrative about foreigners’ engineering such an intricate “attack on the homeland.” The White House “reassuringly” did announce that there is “overwhelming evidence” that bin Laden was behind the attacks.3 Just saying so makes it true, naturally. Politicians do not lie. Major problem: “A government innocent of mass murder would be expected not only to seek the truth about the crime but to show particular zeal in doing so, including presentation of the most incriminating evidence it possesses.”4 Behavior not in evidence then nor decades later.
On June 6, 2006, FBI spokesman Rex Tomb admitted, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”5 Tomb’s fuller statement said: ”The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” But he also added, “They could add 9-11 on there.” Huh? David Kelley, the former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings in 1998, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to Sept. 11 on the official wanted poster, claiming the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant. The real explanation obviously is that no “hard evidence” exists for the DOJ to convince a grand jury even in its controlled, non-adversarial proceedings to bring criminal charges against OBL.6
The farcical 9/11 Commission Report of 2004 spun the official narrative written by Philip Zelikow, a trusted Bush/Cheney insider and mythology expert, allegedly largely written in advance of the Commission’s so-called investigation. The Commission only issued subpoenas to three government agencies, much testimony was not under oath—including that of President Bush and Vice President Cheney—and the Commission had no direct access to government interrogations of jailed Muslim suspects nor did it interview the interrogators of alleged 9/11 conspirators like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who were tortured into confessions. Some 6 million people have probably been murdered as a result of the plane yarns spun on and after 9/11, and most of this ghastly human toll by the U.S. global domination project has been Muslims.7 Additional disastrous effects include the death of thousands of American soldiers, millions of refugees and trillions of dollars down the tubes.
Recently Patrick J. Buchanan wrote, “Because al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden had been given sanctuary by the Taliban in Kabul, who refused to give him up, we invaded, overthrew that Islamist regime and cleansed Tora Bora of al-Qaida.”8 Among other problems, Buchanan’s sentence overlooks the fact that the “Taliban said that it would hand bin Laden over if the United States presented evidence of his involvement in 9/11, Bush refused.”9 Oops, the absence of such evidence made it impossible for poor Mr. Bush to plausibly comply with the Taliban request. As if he wanted to. Bush has proudly chirped “I’m a war president!”10 and has also coldly commented, “Anyway, it [9/11] was an interesting day.”11
I read antiwar.com every morning. Amid an array of often excellent analysis, there are occasional references to 9/11, almost mandatory since 9/11 is the mother of these wars yet none of the articles are critical, just passive acceptance of the official nonsense on stilts. For example, take James Bovard’s serious case of suspended disbelief here: “After Al Qaeda hijacked four airplanes on September 11, 2001, wreaking death and destruction in New York and Washington, it was inevitable that the U.S. military would respond.”12 So smart guys like Bovard, Doug Bandow: “…al-Qaeda—which should be remembered as the group responsible for killing more than 3000 Americans on 9/11,”13 Ted Galen Carpenter14 and even Edward Snowden15 remain within the boundaries of the official 9/11 asininity, likely afraid to risk dismissal as “nutballs.” Yet “it is the appeaser who unleashes [evil men] on mankind,” wrote Ayn Rand, “it is the appeaser’s intellectual abdication that invites them to take over.”16 The pervasive threat of “career suicide” continues to keep most analysts’ lips zipped, affirming America’s hyper-top-down structure with fear as its main control mechanism and a lying, murderous, crumbling empire as the consequence. Meanwhile, the Zelikows of the world thrive.17
To drill down to the reality of the massive deception of 9/11, we must begin with a critical look at the “seeing is believing” tenet, which must be discarded:
Max Weisbach: “…even for those of us who are psychologists, it can be very difficult to disbelieve something we see with our own eyes. Hence, rejecting a first impression can require a very difficult act—to literally ‘unsee’ what seems like ongoing evidence in support of that first impression.”18
Steven Bienkowski, 37, NYPD Harbor Unit Scuba Team, was flying in a helicopter on 9/11 just southwest of WTC Tower 2 when a United aircraft [image] flew just beneath his ship: “When that second plane went into the building, it just looked like an evil magician’s trick. It looked nothing like what I would have imagined a plane crashing into a building would look like. The plane just completely disappeared and turned into a giant fireball. Being there was surreal.”19
Evan Fairbanks, video photographer of a famous 9/11 penetration of the South Tower by a plane image, said in an interview with Peter Jennings, ABC News anchor, at 5:03pm on 9/11: “…it disappeared like a bad special effect, it disappeared right into the building…it’s still uncomprehensible what is actually happening there.”20
Robert M. Gates, then President of Texas A&M University, responding to A&M professor emeritus Morgan Reynolds’ 2005 article challenging the 9/11 narrative,21 declared: “The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September 11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale.”22
In the 9/11 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui in 2006, U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema instructed the jury that the term “weapons of mass destruction” includes airplanes used as missiles.23 Therefore, as Davidsson points out, according to the official account all deaths on 9/11, including the deaths of over 2,700 persons at the World Trade Center, trace back to deliberate crashes of designated aircraft. The aircraft have been officially designated as the main murder weapons.
Yet there is no authentic evidence that such aircraft crashed on 9/11 into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, as maintained by the United States Government, the lying legacy media, and—unfortunately—many 9/11 researchers and the general public too. In fact, “there is an abundance of evidence to the contrary” [Wood, p. xxxii]. That does not mean there were no airplanes as part of an elaborate and confusing operation performed on 9/11. It only means that “no evidence of the alleged airplanes was found at the crime scenes.”
Prosecutors cannot legally convict anyone of murder without proving beyond reasonable doubt how the accused committed the murder, i.e., what weapon(s) was used to kill. Steven Bienkowski and Evan Fairbanks, indeed, were right in their 9/11 descriptions: the second “plane” looked like an evil magician’s trick or a bad special effect because the crash did not look real. Reason: none of the 9/11 “crashes” were real. We can prove this surprising truth based on irrefutable physical evidence as well as confirming evidence available for virtually all aspects of the official conspiracy theory.
It takes only one fact to refute the official 9/11 narrative, though we seem to have dozens, if not hundreds. To acknowledge America’s longest war—over two decades and counting—let us initially whittle the evidence down to 20 items:
1. There is no evidence for an Islamic attack from Afghanistan. As Elias Davidsson proves through his meticulous work and despite repeated requests from media, U.S. government officials never offered the promised evidence to support their claim of an Islamic attack from Afghanistan, nor a bin Laden connection to 9/11 (aside from an absurdly fake December 13, 2001 “confessional” video which the government refuses to authenticate24 and another video released in 2004) nor have Department of Justice officials ever attempted to accuse OBL of the 9/11 mass murder crime before a grand jury, hence he was never cited on the FBI’s “most wanted” list for the crime of 9/11.
2. There is no evidence that individuals designated by the US Government boarded the designated flights. Inarguably “A goal of a criminal investigation is to identify the perpetrators.”25 Four classes of evidence should have been produced by the United States government: i) Authentic flight manifests with the names of all passengers and crew (a legal necessity for insurance purposes); ii) Authentic security videos from the airports depicting all passengers, including suspected hijackers; iii) Sworn testimonies by personnel who attended the boardings of the aircraft; and iv) Legal identification of bodies or bodily remains from crash sites including chain-of-custody reports. None of this evidence exists. For example, no hijacker names appear on the various inconsistent passenger flight lists (manifests) for any of the 9/11 airliners in question. No security videos exist from Boston Logan (alleged departing flights AA11 and UA 175) and Newark (alleged UA 93). The Portland Maine Jetport footage is disputed but even if authentic provides zero information about what happened upon arrival in Boston. The Dulles video tape (AAFL 77) shows none of the 58 passengers, especially those nationally known like Barbara Olson, and has multiple defects.26
3. The alleged hijackers conveniently left an absurd, clear trail of evidence. Even some of the mainstream media scoffed at this.27 Yet Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI, said on April 19, 2002, “In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot.”28 Isn’t this close to admitting that there is no way the FBI had enough “hard evidence” to drag criminal indictments of OBL and 19 Muslim hijackers out of a grand jury?
4. Automated Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) data showed that American flights 11 and 77 never took off. Australian 9/11 researcher Gerard Holmgren discovered this fact in 2003.29
5. Seven or more of the designated hijackers were reported alive by media shortly after 9/11. This fact and most others, of course, were ignored by the 9/11 Commission in favor of the pure Zellikow/Kean fiction. During September 16-23, 2001, people with hijacker names and identifying details proved still alive according to mainstream sources.30 Explanation: the accused perpetrators had their identities stolen just like conventional criminals would do. And the U.S. government like most others employs plenty of criminals.
6. “The most mysterious failure concerns the slow response of U.S. fighters to the hijacked planes,” an unprecedented string of failures by intelligence, aviation security and law enforcement.31 The vaunted and mighty expensive U.S. defense establishment intercepted none of the alleged hijacked Boeing airliners. By contrast in the preceding year 2000, 129 fighter aircraft were scrambled when aircraft problems were not immediately resolved. Between September 2000 and June 2001 fighters scrambled 67 times. Yet the accused hijackers were complete bunglers “who lose driver’s licenses and airline tickets, need a translator at the airport and do not know what they hold in their hand…klutzes…who defeated the U.S. air defenses on 9/11.”32
7. Radar flight tracking and videos establish impossible speeds near sea level (425-583 mph) for Boeing civilian aircraft. See pilot John Lear’s affidavit on behalf of my federal court case suing NIST’s 9/11 contractors for scientific fraud.33
8. Hijackers, weighing a “buck forty” or less and untrained in flying a huge jetliner could not possibly force pilots out of their seats which would require killing them, blood all over the cockpit and its controls, and could not navigate to their targets and even skilled pilots on simulators cannot hit a target of 208’ wide going 443 mph, much less 580 mph. “Assuming, however, that the alleged hijacker was able to navigate into a position to approach the WTC tower at a speed of approximately 790 feet per second the alleged hijacker would have about 67 seconds to navigate the last 10 miles. During that 67 seconds the pilot would have to line up perfectly with a 208 ft. wide target (the tower) and stay lined up with the clacker clacking plus the tremendous air noise against the windshield and the bucking bronco-like airplane, exceeding the Boeing 767 maximum stability limits and encountering early morning turbulence caused by rising irregular currents of air.” For more see the John Lear affidavit in my 9/11 federal court case.34
9. No wingtip vortices. “Wingtip vortices are circular patterns of rotating air left behind a wing as it generates lift…When a wing generates aerodynamic lift, it results in a region of downwash behind the aircraft, between the two vortices.”35 A real 767 crashing into a WTC tower would have left a visible circular pattern off the wing tips in the post-crash explosion for a few minutes but no such phenomena occurred. Researcher Mark Conlon remarks: “Wide-body aircraft produce especially powerful wingtip vortices – horizontal, tornado-like winds off the ends of the wings.”
10. No strobe lights. To quote John Lear on the 9/11 plane videos: “…there is no evidence of strobe lights. They say…maybe they’re too dim. Those things are pretty bright and they’re put on there for a reason so that they’ll alert other airplanes that you’re coming there and there’s three of them on the 767, one on the tail and one on each wing and out of the 41 videos that I’ve seen, I’ve never seen a strobe light.”36
11. Lack of bright reflections off the aircraft in bright sunlight. “The plane has an unreal appearance. The lighting and proportions of the plane are unreal. The plane has no strobe lights. The plane also casts no shadow. Go on Youtube and watch plane spotter videos of real airplanes from the 1990’s up to 2001 and you will not find anything that looks like this ‘plane.’”37
12. There is no significant deceleration of UA flight 175 (N612UA) into the South Tower. Therefore no force was applied to the plane image. Even NIST agrees! No deceleration is evident/measurable. Therefore, the building by definition offered no more resistance to the plane’s forward motion than thin air. It is another impossibility, violating all three of Sir Isaac Newton’s laws of classical mechanics. Steel formed 37% of the surface area of the twin tower exteriors. Further, a real plane would have broken up at the dense steel core (47 massive steel, cross braced columns) inside the South Tower within 37’ of the outer wall, assuring that the majority of a 159’ long aircraft would stay outside. And that did not happen either.
13. The four cleanest alleged crash sites in aviation history. This fact merely points out that there is zero evidence of violent collisions at any of the four events because there is no substantial plane wreckage anywhere despite Boeing 767 and 757 airliners consisting of over 3 million parts. For more see https://nomoregames.net/2007/08/20/madison-what-planes-presentation/.38 There is no visible wreckage much less verified plane parts in any of the holes in the twin towers, Pentagon and a 20’x10’x6’ hole in reclaimed mining ground in Somerset Pennsylvania. The absence of mass quantities of airliner debris in all four cases implies that no violent collisions occurred, a physical impossibility repeated four times on 9/11! Further confirmation comes in the form of multiple videos showing the entry of an airplane image effortlessly disappearing into the WTC South Tower with no collision to demolish the airliner (image) upon contact. A plane image gliding into a steel/concrete tower, not losing a flap, panel, actuator, wing tip, tail section–nothing. “There are 6 videos that show clearly the “plane” disappearing into the face of the South Tower. These are Michael Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Evan Fairbanks, Park Foreman, Jennifer Spell, Shizzham and Antonio Rosario. These videos show in plain view impossible crash dynamics, proving undeniably that the ‘planes’ can not have been real.”39 And numerous photos show no plane parts in either gash in the twin towers. This is especially amazing at the South Tower because the central structure (core) full of dense cross-braced steel is only 37’ from the outer wall. A Boeing 767 is 159 feet long, so up to 122’ should have remained visible outside and below the South Tower. By contrast, the dense core was 60 feet from the outer wall at the North Tower. We can label it all as “cartoon physics.”40
14. “The FBI has admitted in court that it did no formal identification of 9/11 aircraft wreckage. Yet as many as 29 aircraft at one point were suspected of having been hijacked.”41 This behavior is unprecedented but telling, further proving that the government’s narrative is complete hogwash. Once again, we are left with zero proof that specific 9/11 Boeing planes crashed at the WTC, Pentagon and in rural Pennsylvania. “In legal parlance, …[government has] failed to formally identify the tools of the crime that resulted in the deaths of approximately 3,000 people on September 11, 2001.”42
15. Big planes and small holes equal big problem for the official story. In 10,000 pages NIST and its contractors avoided estimating the dimensions of the WTC gashes, an easy and necessary task.43 The obvious explanation is that if they had done so, it would have been well nigh impossible to continue the hoax that wide-body jetliners disappeared inside each tower. The depicted openings are too small to permit passage of a Boeing 767—159 feet long, 156 feet wide and 49 feet tall (landing gear retracted)—yet the WTC North Tower hole was approximately 125 feet wide in terms of severed columns and under 40 feet tall. The South Tower hole was even smaller, with a width of only about 106 feet by my measure in severed columns, or two-thirds of that required to swallow a 767 whole.44 The slightly smaller Boeing 757 could not disappear into a hole in the ground in Pennsylvania approximately 20’x10’x6’, much less a Pentagon hole about 20’ wide.
16. In sum, all four crashes exhibit violations of Newton’s laws of motion and therefore are physically impossible. See slides 81-89 here.45 And aluminum wings cannot cut through 14” steel box columns.46
17. De-registrations of the designated aircraft were delayed as much as five years despite regulations requiring de-registration within 24 hours for destroyed aircraft. The two AA airliner tail numbers were deregistered four months late on January 14, 2002 and the two alleged United Airlines tail numbers were not deregistered until September 28, 2005, over five years late.47 I could find no record of hull insurance being paid on any of the allegedly lost aircraft. A worried insurance company only five blocks from the World Trade Center would not talk to me.
18. ACARS messaging data show United Flight 175 which allegedly crashed into the WTC South Tower and United Flight 93 which allegedly crashed in western Pennsylvania both continued flying west far beyond NYC and Somerset County PA respectively after the “crash” times as work by Pilots for 9/11 Truth and English researcher Mark Conlon establishes.48
19. Passenger cell calls at cruising airliner altitudes were impossible and therefore faked. This issue is vital. Why? Because “…the official account of 9/11 is mainly based on the phone calls,” as Elias Davidsson points out.49 “It is the callers who told people on the ground that their aircraft was being hijacked.” See his pp. 217-18 on impossible cell calls.
20. ELT: “Emergency Transmitter Locator signals are broadcast by radio transmitters carried aboard aircraft and are supposed to activate only in the event the aircraft crashes, their function being to facilitate searches for the aircraft wreckage.”50 While an ELT went off two minutes before AAFL 11 allegedly crashed into the WTC, no ELT went off at the crash time of 8:46 a.m. Similarly, United Airlines “Flight 175” (UAFL 175), which allegedly crashed into the South Tower at 9:03 a.m., an ELT signal occurred four minutes before at 8:59 a.m. There is no evidence of an ELT reported for United Airlines ‘Flight 93′ nor American Airlines ‘Flight 77’, so none of the four airplanes claimed as being involved on 9/11 crashed at any of the “alleged” targets at the times named in the official 9/11 narrative. While Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) mentioned ELT signals in their interviews with the 9/11 Commission, the Commission Report never explained this anomalous evidence.
Faked Videos or Videos of Plane Images in the Sky?
While many 9/11 researchers have come around to the view that no real Boeing 767 and 757 planes crashed on 9/11, a debate has raged over what technology was used: were computer graphic images (cgi) inserted into every video of a kamikaze airliner crashing into a tower or did all videographers independently film a 3D image of a visible airliner? Another question follows: since no real plane crashed into either tower, what caused the gashes?
In my opinion, the answer to faked videos vs. honest videos of visible plane images has been provided by Richard D. Hall.51 He decided to “map” as many of the useful flight 175 plane crash videos as he could onto a 3D-model of Manhattan. As Andrew Johnson sums it up: “This analysis was published on 21 May 2012 and revealed that 26 clips of the flight 175 crash did indeed appear to match the Radar Data supplied by the NTSB…This tended to rule out the idea of ‘simple video fakery’ – which is what most other ‘no planers’ argue.”52
One of the difficulties with the “only video fakery” position is that some witnesses reported seeing a plane, though there were sufficient variations in their accounts to suggest that there were issues with viewing the projected image from certain locations. And the “disappearing wings” observed in some clips should not happen with CGI. Another is impossible speeds, likely explained by the imperfect imagery that would be noticed by more eyewitnesses at slower speeds.
In his latest video (2017) Richard D. Hall remarks: “I concluded from this analysis that the video images were not the result of computer graphic forgery. There are just too many camera angles to have gone round and collected all of the amateur clips without one of them falling through the net…some researchers still cling to the notion that nothing visible appeared in the sky and plane images were cut and pasted into all of the videos after the event. Surely these researchers left their Occam’s razor rusting in the garden shed.”53
This analysis implies top secret projection technology, entirely possible within the U.S. military-industrial complex and vital to be kept secret. To use military lingo, deception is a “force multiplier,” especially against an ignorant public. To support the plausibility of such secret technology, consider ongoing civilian progress on 3D floating images that move in the air.54
What Made the Gashes?
“On the morning of 9/11, there were two towers, each over a quarter-mile tall and made of 500,000 tons of material. And then they went away. They were gone in a mere 8 to 10 seconds.”
—Dr. Judy Wood, WDTTG, 2010, p. 40.
Back in 2005 I puzzled over how the gashes looked and could not have been made by airliners.55 Answer today: Highly likely, a directed energy weapon (DEW) made the gashes. For anyone who doubts the existence of such weaponry—Russians use the term energetics—I direct you to the Directed Energy Professional Society.56 If a “cold, free energy DEW” can disappear two buildings weighing a combined 1 million tons, then punching a gash in such buildings should be child’s play.
Consider a few clues in the evidence. Earth is surrounded by a magnetic field that was disturbed on 9/11 at the moment that the destructive events in NYC took place. Dr. Wood points out that field effects and magnetism interact and says, “The magnetometer readings from…northern Alaska reveal anomalous changes in the Earth’s magnetic field at the exact moments that key events were taking place in New York City on 9/11 (p. 413)…the timing, magnitude, and relationships of these fluctuations are unusual. In fact, the timing of these anomalous fluctuations is downright uncanny” (p. 415).
Among 117 interviewed eyewitnesses in position to see the second plane (image) only 21 saw it and about half of them also heard it, but eyewitness photographer David Handschuh offered an interesting clue, describing the sound when the South Tower got its hole and then, later, the sound when the South Tower “disintegrated” as “another loud noise that kind of echoed the first noise…Looked up and [thought] OK, it’s another aircraft…and the whole building was just disintegrating.”57
Richard D. Hall points to the Naudet video of the hit at the North Tower in which there is a curious delay in creation of the wing hole on the right side, a roadrunner effect made after passage of the plane image.58
English researcher Mark Conlon is doing extensive research on 9/11 airplane confusion worth a mention. A good deal of the muddle may be attributed to the military war games conducted on 9/11, including simulated hijackings. Conlon intends a book tracking it all in detail. Also see Davidsson, Hijacking America’s Mind…ch. 14 on this issue.
Finally, I urge you to watch 9-11 Alchemy: Facing Reality59 by Chris Hampton of Wolf Clan Media, the best 9/11 documentary I’ve seen, well worth 3 hours of your time.
As Edward Snowden has said, “When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals!”
1 Holmgren, http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/10/064.html; James Corbett, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T-zZi-X2wg
3 The Terror Timeline, p. 492 (MSNBC, 9/13/101), https://www.pbs.org/flashpointsusa/20040629/infocus/topic_01/timeline_sep2001.html
4 Elias Davidsson, America’s Betrayal Confirmed: Purpose, Cover-Up and Impunity (Reykjavi: Toost, 2020, p. 71
9 David Ray Griffin, Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory, Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2007, p. 128
16 Harry Binswanger, ed., The Ayn Rand Lexicon, New York: Meridian, 1988, p.154
18 Quoted by Dr. Judy Wood, Where Did the Towers Go?, 2010, p. 488
19 Quoted in https://nomoregames.net/2008/02/28/the-original-no-planers-most-witnesses-at-the-wtc-heard-and-saw-no-planes/
22 Quoted in David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, eds., 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Ch. 7, Reynolds, “9/11, Texas A&M University, and Heresy,” Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2007; https://nomoregames.net/2017/01/28/911-texas-am-university-and-heresy/
23 Elias Davidsson, America’s Betrayal…, p. 98
25 Davidsson, America’s Betrayal…p. xxx
26 Davidsson, Hijacking America’s Mind, pp. 52-3; and America’s Betrayal…, pp. 66-8
27 Paul Thompson, The Terror Timeline, pp. 490-1
30 The Terror Timeline, pp. 496-8; David Ray Griffin, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2005, pp. 19-23
31 The Terror Timeline, p. 346-7
32 Davidsson, America’s Betrayal…, Conclusions to Ch. 6, p. 96
34 https://morganreynolds.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/080128_94affidavitlear.pdf, plus an interview https://nomoregames.net/2010/12/14/an-interview-with-pilot-john-lear/, plus the testimony of other pilots https://911planeshoax.com
41 Davidsson, America’s Betrayal…, pp. 100-1
42 ibid., pp. 101-2
43 https://morganreynolds.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/080128_reynolds93aff.pdf, p. 12
46 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zt1oTYhcgo, http://www.911planeshoax.com, https://nomoregames.net/2018/12/05/drone-versus-airplane-wing/
47 https://nomoregames.net/2006/08/16/playing-the-911-unity-card/;https://nomoregames.net/2007/08/20/madison-what-planes-presentation/, slide 10
48 http://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/2020/05/, http://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/2020/02/
49 Hijacking America’s Mind…p. 123
52 http://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf, pp. 55-6
57 WDTTG, pp. 304-5 and 442
58 http://cdn1.richplanet.net/mp4/233_03.mp4 at 20:37
Book no.7 Morgan?
We saw what they did that day. We listened to them lie about it. Why would anyone let these psychos put anything in their bloodstream?
Why? Misplaced trust.
The you refer to are known as ‘The Poisoners of History’ , and they had already poisoned / weakened / dumbed-down / disabled the minds of the population to the point that by the time of 9/11 , most people had lost their critical thinking faculties and ‘bought’ the Official Narrative …….. Since then , minds have been further poisoned to permit the injection of More Poison into their bodies and minds
great overview, many thanks. Why “adieu”?
Just another way to say goodbye for now, for this article only, no greater import than that.